From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757465Ab3EGSlw (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 14:41:52 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:50387 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314Ab3EGSlt (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 14:41:49 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 0/5] ARM: Third batch of arm-soc changes for 3.10, again Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 20:41:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-18-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: ARM SoC , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1367947574-2934383-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305072041.37493.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:b0lIMCFSJx+7xBVT1o58kb546Fu0pJmCc3UEg7ug6WF hLRifLJ5qlztN6NIE+PfOycBlr4VIi0bSjg3wlXct1t9M5HX1H LDxq5SfXP2+GRrX6/IAM55riFMJN/B/u3JlJwQ64xJET7PBzHc w0mLLvC4/6ee96jHD1qnHFONwnc/uJ/f88tUjnViDfd2TS26Ri Ht4yqD/z/khniumnRdxWam8nNxzRcorozxsHJO3uy93ewvdHCW iPJH+7UsQNY8S8S+yZiWAgMgWhr1smNMaxxZ4NQ6YLZWkZ09Z5 7qeuFz+WgjmEIITRgiIsO4rFUsh4cUSGtCsAGa+9pE5fQfw2jW R1DwJlDf8urwYVpF8gfw= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 07 May 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Here are the same pull requests as before, with numbers and distinct > > time stamps. I hope I didn't screw up in a different way this time. > > Ok, I notice that you seem to have forgotten the "--summary" flag from > your diffstat in your new script. > > Not a showstopper, but make sure that the diffstat flags are > > "git diff -M --stat --summary" > > (And yes, I prefer "-M", not "-C", because while copy information is > interesting, it tends to hide the fact that the copying added a lot of > lines, so the "-C" flag ends up not giving as good line add/del > information, even if the data that something looks like a copy of > another file is interesting). Right, another thing that I actually knew and then forgot to do. Olof has just sent me the script he used the past few times, I'll use that in the future. Arnd