From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757266Ab3EHQjT (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 12:39:19 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:48469 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755276Ab3EHQjP (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 May 2013 12:39:15 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 18:38:43 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Block IO core changes for 3.10 Message-ID: <20130508163843.GQ7800@kernel.dk> References: <20130508145023.GN7800@kernel.dk> <20130508151126.GP7800@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 08 2013, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> > >> Frankly the pull is just late since I have been busy with that and > >> company bits. If you look at the history, there's been no changes in > >> more than a week. > > > > Ok, good. The timing made me nervous.. > > Oh, and should I made BIO_RESET_BITS and BIO_OWNS_VEC be 13? We have a The numbers aren't important, as long as they are different. > new BIO_SNAP_STABLE that is 12, and I'm really hoping these values > aren't exposed anywhere to users.. Strictly in-kernel stuff, so no problems there. No bio flags are propagated to user space. -- Jens Axboe