From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
sjayaraman@novell.com
Subject: Re: Mount failure due to restricted access to a point along the mount path
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:27:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130510102754.184cd90d@corrin.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegtADAJ+7-DiFvrgWU1N5Fsd_CCQryT0mpx6VOJ=8ikKsA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 10 May 2013 16:13:30 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A while ago this was discussed:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cifs/7779
>
> This is essentially a regression introduced by the shared superblock
> changes in 3.0 and several SUSE customers are complaining about it.
> I've created a temporary fix which reverts 29 commits related to the
> shared superblock changes. It works, but it's obviously not a
> permanent fix, especially since we definitely don't want to diverge
> from mainline.
>
> Is this issue being worked on? Don't other distros have similar reports?
>
> Thanks,
> Miklos
I don't know of anyone currently working on it. There are a couple of
possible approaches to fixing it, I think:
1) if the dentries to get down to the root of the mount don't already
exist, then attach some sort of "placeholder" inode that can be fleshed
out later if and when the dentry is accessed via other means.
2) do something like what NFS does (see commit 54ceac45). This becomes
a bit more complicated due to the fact that the server may not hand out
real inode numbers and we sometimes have to fake them up.
#1 is probably simpler to implement, but I'll confess that I haven't
thought through all of the potential problems with it.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-10 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-10 14:13 Mount failure due to restricted access to a point along the mount path Miklos Szeredi
2013-05-10 14:27 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2013-05-14 8:51 ` Jeff Layton
2013-05-14 10:44 ` Steve French
2013-05-14 11:09 ` Jeff Layton
2013-05-14 13:08 ` Steve French
2013-05-16 6:19 ` Pavel Shilovsky
2013-10-07 3:22 ` Shirish Pargaonkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130510102754.184cd90d@corrin.poochiereds.net \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sjayaraman@novell.com \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox