From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init/Kconfig: Add option to set modprobe command
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 15:59:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130513135947.GA1613@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKi4VAK3paytaMGBmu0oVGcLUeuCbL7i3aht-Ho7rz7cdf5KTg@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/10, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 05/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>
> >> > > -char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe";
> >> > > +char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe -q --";
> >>
> >> No. This is incompatible change, we shouldn't do this.
> >
> > Exactly. This can break a distro which writes to sys/kernel/modprobe.
> >
> > And if we do not do this, you can simply make a single trivial patch
> > which does
...
> > that it all. (or perhaps a kernel parameter makes more sense).
> >
> > Yes, this doesn't allow to pass the additional arguments, but is it
> > that important?
>
> Yes, because I don't want to simply change the binary to use, I want
> to be able to use a general "kmod" binary that accept a command like
> "load". Next version of kmod will accept things like this (see the
> commit message in patch 3/3):
Well, but a link to the binary which checks argv[0] or a trivial executable
which simply execs "kmod load" looks like the simple workaround. And this
doesn't need to recompile the kernel.
Lucas, I simply do not know...
Andrew, Rusty, what do you think? Can we do the change above? Do we
really want CONFIG_MODPROBE_PATH or a kernel parameter ?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-10 4:15 [PATCH 1/3] argv_split(): Allow extra params Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-10 4:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] kmod: Use argv_split(), passing module as extra param Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-10 4:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] init/Kconfig: Add option to set modprobe command Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-10 12:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-10 13:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-10 13:15 ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-10 15:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-10 16:03 ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-10 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-10 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-10 17:44 ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-13 13:59 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-05-11 20:10 ` Lucas De Marchi
2013-05-13 14:16 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 14:35 ` [RFC] teach argv_split() to ignore the spaces surrounded by \e Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-13 16:06 ` Colin Walters
2013-05-13 17:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130513135947.GA1613@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox