From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ak@linux.intel.com" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf, x86, lbr: Demand proper privileges for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:17:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130516091707.GG19669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130516090916.GF19669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:09:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> How about something like the below? It also adds the branch flags Mikey wanted
> for PowerPC.
The asymmetry is unfortunate, but I think its more useful to have the from
kernel branch target than it is not to have it. This way you at least know
there was a kernel entry/exit and where you've continued.
Without either branch to kernel and branch from kernel entries you'd be
wondering WTF happend to your control flow.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 12 +++++++++---
> include/linux/perf_event.h | 10 +++++++---
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> index d978353..f44d635 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
> @@ -585,17 +585,23 @@ intel_pmu_lbr_filter(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
>
> /* if type does not correspond, then discard */
> if (type == X86_BR_NONE || (br_sel & type) != type) {
> - cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = 0;
> + cpuc->lbr_entries[i].__delete = 1;
> compress = true;
> }
> +
> + /* hide kernel addresses if we're not privileged */
> + if (!(br_sel & X86_BR_KERNEL) && kernel_ip(from)) {
> + cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from = -1L;
> + cpuc->lbr_entries[i].invalid_from = 1;
> + }
> }
>
> if (!compress)
> return;
>
> - /* remove all entries with from=0 */
> + /* remove all entries with __delete */
> for (i = 0; i < cpuc->lbr_stack.nr; ) {
> - if (!cpuc->lbr_entries[i].from) {
> + if (cpuc->lbr_entries[i].__delete) {
> j = i;
> while (++j < cpuc->lbr_stack.nr)
> cpuc->lbr_entries[j-1] = cpuc->lbr_entries[j];
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index f463a46..7acf1c9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -77,9 +77,13 @@ struct perf_raw_record {
> struct perf_branch_entry {
> __u64 from;
> __u64 to;
> - __u64 mispred:1, /* target mispredicted */
> - predicted:1,/* target predicted */
> - reserved:62;
> + __u64 mispred:1, /* target mispredicted */
> + predicted:1, /* target predicted */
> + invalid_to:1, /* @to isn't to be trusted */
> + invalid_from:1, /* @from isn't to be trusted */
> + reserved:59,
> + __delete:1; /* Implementation; userspace should
> + always see a 0 */
> };
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-16 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-03 12:11 [PATCH 0/3] Various perf patches Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 12:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf, x86: Blacklist all MEM_*_RETIRED events for IVB Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 14:35 ` Andi Kleen
2013-05-03 17:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-15 14:20 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-15 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-16 15:42 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-16 16:07 ` Andi Kleen
2013-05-16 16:26 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-04 8:20 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86: Blacklist all MEM_*_RETIRED events for Ivy Bridge tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 12:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf, x86, lbr: Fix LBR filter Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 14:34 ` Andi Kleen
2013-05-04 6:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-04 8:21 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 12:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf, x86, lbr: Demand proper privileges for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 14:41 ` Andi Kleen
2013-05-04 8:22 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf/x86/intel/lbr: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-04 11:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-05 9:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-06 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-06 9:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-15 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf, x86, lbr: " Stephane Eranian
2013-05-15 14:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-16 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-16 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-05-16 10:09 ` Michael Neuling
2013-05-16 10:15 ` Michael Neuling
2013-05-16 11:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-16 15:36 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-17 11:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-17 11:32 ` Michael Neuling
2013-05-17 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-17 21:39 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-17 22:14 ` Michael Neuling
2013-05-17 22:59 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-21 5:41 ` Michael Neuling
2013-05-21 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-21 13:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-21 13:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-22 6:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-05-22 12:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2013-05-22 14:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130516091707.GG19669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox