public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: avi.kivity@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] KVM: MMU: delete shadow page from hash list in kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 13:47:13 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130519104713.GE4725@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1368738782-18649-3-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:12:57AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Move deletion shadow page from the hash list from kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page to
> kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page so that we can call kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page
> once for multiple kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page that can help us to avoid
> unnecessary TLB flush
> 
Don't we call kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page() once for multiple
kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page() now when possible? kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page()
gets a list as a parameter. I am not against the change, but wish to
understand it better.

> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    8 ++++++--
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 40d7b2d..682ecb4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1466,7 +1466,7 @@ static inline void kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, int nr)
>  static void kvm_mmu_free_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
>  {
>  	ASSERT(is_empty_shadow_page(sp->spt));
> -	hlist_del(&sp->hash_link);
> +
>  	list_del(&sp->link);
>  	free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
>  	if (!sp->role.direct)
> @@ -1655,7 +1655,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
>  
>  #define for_each_gfn_indirect_valid_sp(_kvm, _sp, _gfn)			\
>  	for_each_gfn_sp(_kvm, _sp, _gfn)				\
> -		if ((_sp)->role.direct || (_sp)->role.invalid) {} else
> +		if ((_sp)->role.direct ||				\
> +		      ((_sp)->role.invalid && WARN_ON(1))) {} else
>  
>  /* @sp->gfn should be write-protected at the call site */
>  static int __kvm_sync_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> @@ -2074,6 +2075,9 @@ static int kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
>  		unaccount_shadowed(kvm, sp->gfn);
>  	if (sp->unsync)
>  		kvm_unlink_unsync_page(kvm, sp);
> +
> +	hlist_del_init(&sp->hash_link);
> +
What about moving this inside if() bellow and making it hlist_del()?
Leave the page on the hash if root_count is non zero.

>  	if (!sp->root_count) {
>  		/* Count self */
>  		ret++;
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6

--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-19 10:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-16 21:12 [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 21:12 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] KVM: MMU: drop unnecessary kvm_reload_remote_mmus Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 21:12 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] KVM: MMU: delete shadow page from hash list in kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-19 10:47   ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2013-05-20  9:19     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-20  9:42       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-16 21:12 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] KVM: MMU: fast invalidate all pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-19 10:04   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-20  9:12     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-20 19:46   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-20 20:15     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-20 20:40       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-21  3:36         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-21  8:45           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-22  1:41           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-21  8:39         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-22  1:33           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-22  6:34             ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-22  8:46               ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-22  8:54                 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-22  9:41                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-22 13:17                     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-22 15:25                       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-22 15:42                         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-05-22 15:06               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-05-16 21:12 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] KVM: MMU: zap pages in batch Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] KVM: x86: use the fast way to invalidate all pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] KVM: MMU: show mmu_valid_gen in shadow page related tracepoints Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-16 21:13 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] KVM: MMU: add tracepoint for kvm_mmu_invalidate_all_pages Xiao Guangrong
2013-05-19 10:49 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages Gleb Natapov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130519104713.GE4725@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox