From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
sbw@mit.edu
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/8] v2 RCU callback-numbering simplifications for 3.11
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 07:37:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130520143739.GA29365@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello!
This series takes advantage of callback numbering to simplify RCU's
grace-period machinery, in some cases also reducing the number of
lock acquisitions (though the resulting change in performance is not
perceptible). The individual patches are as follows:
1. Move code to make way for the code-combining in later patches.
This commit makes no changes, just moves code.
2. Make __note_new_gpnum() also check for the ends of prior grace
periods, thus eliminating the earlier possibility of a given
CPU becoming aware of the start of the next grace period before
becoming aware of the end of the previous grace period. Yes,
the code did handle this correctly, but now it doesn't need to.
More important, now I don't need to think about how it handles
this correctly.
3. Rename note_new_gpnum() to note_gp_changes() in preparation for
later merge of rcu_process_gp_end() into this function.
4. Change calls to rcu_process_gp_end() to instead call
note_gp_changes(), and also remove the now-used rcu_process_gp_end().
5. Remove duplicate code by merging __rcu_process_gp_end() into
__note_gp_changes().
6. Eliminate now-redundant call to check_for_new_grace_period(). This
leaves only a single caller, so inline check_for_new_grace_period().
7. Given that rcu_start_gp_per_cpu() is a trivial wrapper function
with only one caller, inline it into its sole remaining call site.
8. Eliminate now-redundant call to note_gp_changes().
Changes since v1:
o Added Reviewed-bys.
Thanx, Paul
b/kernel/rcutree.c | 262 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------
b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 2
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 179 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-20 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-20 14:37 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/8] rcu: Move code to apply callback-numbering simplifications Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/8] rcu: Make __note_new_gpnum() check for ends of prior grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/8] rcu: Rename note_new_gpnum() to note_gp_changes() Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/8] rcu: Switch callers from rcu_process_gp_end() " Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/8] rcu: Merge __rcu_process_gp_end() into __note_gp_changes() Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/8] rcu: Eliminate check_for_new_grace_period() wrapper function Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/8] rcu: Inline trivial wrapper function rcu_start_gp_per_cpu() Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-20 14:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 8/8] rcu: Move redundant call to note_gp_changes() into called function Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130520143739.GA29365@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox