From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754529Ab3EUNQf (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 09:16:35 -0400 Received: from fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.21]:56513 "EHLO cam-smtp0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754439Ab3EUNQe (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 May 2013 09:16:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:15:40 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Chen Gang Cc: Will Deacon , Geert Uytterhoeven , Arnd Bergmann , Tony Lindgren , Santosh Shilimkar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kernel: need extern variable 'screen_info' for related driver using. Message-ID: <20130521131539.GC27002@arm.com> References: <5199B7D6.40907@asianux.com> <20130520091008.GB31359@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <519AE6D7.1090401@asianux.com> <519B278B.6030708@asianux.com> <20130521090336.GC10453@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <519B48B4.6050607@asianux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519B48B4.6050607@asianux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:13:08AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote: > On 05/21/2013 05:03 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:51:39AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote: > >> For me, I still recommend add 'ARM64' in the long list of architectures > >> for 'VGA_CONSOLE', I have 3 reasons, please check: > >> > >> a. current implementation only changes one area which only related with > >> arm64 and 'VGA_CONSOLE', but if use 'CONFIG_HAVE_VGA_CONSOLE', that will > >> touch many multiple platforms dependency, at least we need discuss about > >> it with multiple platforms guys for it, firstly. > > > > That's a weak argument. You might as well propose the cleanup and see what > > people say. > > Hmm.. I think at least, we need discuss it with the 'final applier' > firstly (and now, I even do not know who is the 'final applier'). Well, you can post the patch to linux-arch, cc'ing the arch maintainers whose Kconfig files you touch. If there are no comments, it will most likely be picked by Andrew Morton and sent to Linus (make sure you cc Andrew as well). -- Catalin