From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@gmail.com>,
Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] proc: simplify proc_task_readdir/first_tid paths
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 22:28:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130527202822.GA19288@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130527202751.GA19250@redhat.com>
proc_task_readdir() does not really need "leader", first_tid()
has to revalidate it anyway. Just pass proc_pid(inode) to
first_tid() instead, it can do pid_task(PIDTYPE_PID) itself
and read ->group_leader only if necessary.
Note: I am not sure proc_task_readdir() really needs the initial
-ENOENT check, but this is what the current code does.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index bed1096..dbc4dae 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -3173,34 +3173,35 @@ out_no_task:
* In the case of a seek we start with the leader and walk nr
* threads past it.
*/
-static struct task_struct *first_tid(struct task_struct *leader,
- int tid, int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
+static struct task_struct *first_tid(struct pid *pid, int tid,
+ int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
{
- struct task_struct *pos;
+ struct task_struct *pos, *task;
rcu_read_lock();
- /* Attempt to start with the pid of a thread */
+ task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
+ if (!task)
+ goto fail;
+
+ /* Attempt to start with the tid of a thread */
if (tid && (nr > 0)) {
pos = find_task_by_pid_ns(tid, ns);
- if (pos && (pos->group_leader == leader))
+ if (pos && same_thread_group(pos, task))
goto found;
}
/* If nr exceeds the number of threads there is nothing todo */
- if (nr && nr >= get_nr_threads(leader))
- goto fail;
- /* It could be unhashed before we take rcu lock */
- if (!pid_alive(leader))
+ if (nr && nr >= get_nr_threads(task))
goto fail;
/* If we haven't found our starting place yet start
* with the leader and walk nr threads forward.
*/
- pos = leader;
+ pos = task = task->group_leader;
do {
if (nr-- <= 0)
goto found;
- } while_each_thread(leader, pos);
+ } while_each_thread(task, pos);
fail:
pos = NULL;
goto out;
@@ -3247,26 +3248,13 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldi
{
struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
- struct task_struct *leader = NULL;
struct task_struct *task;
- int retval = -ENOENT;
ino_t ino;
int tid;
struct pid_namespace *ns;
- task = get_proc_task(inode);
- if (!task)
- goto out_no_task;
- rcu_read_lock();
- if (pid_alive(task)) {
- leader = task->group_leader;
- get_task_struct(leader);
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
- put_task_struct(task);
- if (!leader)
- goto out_no_task;
- retval = 0;
+ if (!pid_task(proc_pid(inode), PIDTYPE_PID))
+ return -ENOENT;
switch ((unsigned long)filp->f_pos) {
case 0:
@@ -3289,7 +3277,7 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldi
ns = filp->f_dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
tid = (int)filp->f_version;
filp->f_version = 0;
- for (task = first_tid(leader, tid, filp->f_pos - 2, ns);
+ for (task = first_tid(proc_pid(inode), tid, filp->f_pos - 2, ns);
task;
task = next_tid(task), filp->f_pos++) {
tid = task_pid_nr_ns(task, ns);
@@ -3302,9 +3290,7 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldi
}
}
out:
- put_task_struct(leader);
-out_no_task:
- return retval;
+ return 0;
}
static int proc_task_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, struct kstat *stat)
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-27 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-27 20:27 [PATCH 0/3] proc: first_tid() fix/cleanup Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-27 20:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] proc: first_tid: fix the potential use-after-free Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-29 4:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-29 12:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-27 20:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] proc: change first_tid() to use while_each_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-27 20:28 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-05-29 4:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] proc: simplify proc_task_readdir/first_tid paths Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-29 13:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-29 20:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-31 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-31 18:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-31 18:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-29 5:22 ` [PATCH 0/3] proc: first_tid() fix/cleanup Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130527202822.GA19288@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dserrg@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).