From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>,
"mcrapet@gmail.com" <mcrapet@gmail.com>,
Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] misc/ep93xx_pwm: cleanup driver for conversion to PWM framework
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 13:00:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528110011.GC11547@mithrandir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201305271912.08882.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2177 bytes --]
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 07:12:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 27 May 2013, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> > Ryan Mallon has also provided a Reviewed-by for this series.
> >
> > Will you be the one that merges this? I would like it to be in linux-next
> > before I convert it to the PWM framework.
>
> While Greg and I are both maintainers for drivers/misc, he is the one who
> actually has a git tree for it, so he would merge it.
>
> However, I think it would be better to just merge it all through the pwm
> tree. Your current series is good, and with my Ack I see no problem to
> just do the conversion to pwm on top and send a pull request for all of
> it to Thierry.
While I have no objection to taking the patches through the PWM tree, I
prefer to pick up patches from my inbox. I should probably get used to
taking pull requests to make my life easier, but there was never a need
so far. So if you'll be pushing the series to a tree anyway I can take a
look at it and see if I feel comfortable pulling, but I'd still want to
see the full series as patches for easier review.
> > Also, I have a question about the conversion.
> >
> > If I strip the sysfs support out of this driver the conversion is quite simple.
> > But, my use for this driver requires user space control of the PWM.
> >
> > Should I:
> > 1) convert the driver to the PWM framework and leave the sysfs stuff in it
> > 2) work out a generic sysfs support for the PWM framework and then
> > convert the driver
> > 3) other...
> >
> > I've been looking at 2) by doing something like how gpiolib does it. Do
> > you think that would be acceptable?
>
> That would be for Thierry to decide. It does sound better to me than the 1)
> and I don't have a better idea for 3).
>
> I wonder how the arbitration between in-kernel and user-space consumers
> of the pwm lines would work though.
I've added Lars Poeschel on Cc, who's done some work on a sysfs
interface for the PWM subsystem already. It's undergone some review
already[0] and I think he's working on a v2 now.
Thierry
[0]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136499756101273&w=2
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-28 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 23:19 [PATCH 00/14] misc/ep93xx_pwm: cleanup driver for conversion to PWM framework H Hartley Sweeten
2013-05-26 23:32 ` Ryan Mallon
2013-05-27 15:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-27 16:27 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2013-05-27 17:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 11:00 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-05-28 11:42 ` Lars Poeschel
2013-05-29 21:33 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2013-05-30 11:41 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130528110011.GC11547@mithrandir \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcrapet@gmail.com \
--cc=poeschel@lemonage.de \
--cc=rmallon@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox