public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.10-rc3 xfs mount/recovery failure & ext fsck hang.
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 08:04:09 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130528220409.GD29338@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130528214137.GC24342@redhat.com>

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:41:37PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:32:48AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>  > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 05:15:44PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:10:12AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
>  > >  > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:12:30PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
>  > >  > > box crashed, and needed rebooting. On next bootup, when it found the dirty partition,
>  > >  > > xfs chose to spew and then hang instead of replaying the journal and mounting :(
>  > >  > > 
>  > >  > > [   14.694731] SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, realtime, large block/inode numbers, debug enabled
>  > >  > > [   14.722328] XFS (sda2): Mounting Filesystem
>  > >  > > [   14.757801] XFS (sda2): Starting recovery (logdev: internal)
>  > >  > > [   14.782049] XFS: Assertion failed: fs_is_ok, file: fs/xfs/xfs_dir2_data.c, line: 169
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > A directory block has an entry that is not in the hash index.
>  > >  > Either there's an underlying corruption on disk, or there's an
>  > >  > inconsistency in what has been logged and so an entire change has
>  > >  > not been replayed. Hence the post recovery verification has thrown a
>  > >  > corruption error....
>  > >  > 
>  > >  > If you haven't already repaired the filesystem, can you send me a
>  > >  > metadump of the filesystem in question?
>  > > 
>  > > Sorry, too late. If I can repro, I'll do so next time.
>  > > FYI, I ran xfs_repair and it just hung. Wouldn't even answer ctrl-c.
>  > > Rebooted, and then it mounted and recovered just fine!
>  > 
>  > Strange. I can't think of any reason outside a kernel problem for
>  > xfs_repair going into an uninterruptible sleep. Did it happen after
>  > the repair completed (i.e. after phase 7)? If so, then closing the
>  > block device might have tripped the same problem that fsck.ext2
>  > hit....
> 
> didn't even get that far. It opened the block dev, and then just sat there.
> I left it for a few minutes before deciding it was hung.
> And of course, this is an SSD, so there was no way I could tell if there
> was any IO going on by sound/feel/lights.

OK. Normally when it hangs you can kill it or ctrl-c out because it
gets stuck on a futex. You can then run xfs_repair -P to turn off
threading (and speed :() to avoid such hangs. but given that you
couldn't kill it, it doesn't sound like that sort of problem....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-28 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-28 16:12 3.10-rc3 xfs mount/recovery failure & ext fsck hang Dave Jones
2013-05-28 21:10 ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 21:15   ` Dave Jones
2013-05-28 21:32     ` Dave Chinner
2013-05-28 21:41       ` Dave Jones
2013-05-28 22:04         ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-06-06 12:00 ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130528220409.GD29338@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox