From: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
matt.fleming@intel.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:46:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130529224645.GA16582@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1305300018180.1111@twin.jikos.cz>
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:22:13AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013, Russ Anderson wrote:
>
> > > What appears to be happening is that your the EFI runtime services code
> > > is calling into the EFI boot services code, which is definitely a bug in
> > > your firmware because we're at runtime, but we've seen other machines
> > > that do similar things so we usually handle it just fine. However, what
> > > makes your case different, and the reason you see the above splat, is
> > > that it's using the physical address of the EFI boot services region,
> > > not the virtual one we setup with SetVirtualAddressMap(). Which is a
> > > second firmware bug. Again, we have seen other machines that access
> > > physical addresses after SetVirtualAddressMap(), but until now we
> > > haven't had any non-optional code that triggered them.
> > >
> > > The only reason I can see that the offending commit would introduce this
> > > problem is because it calls QueryVariableInfo() at boot time. I notice
> > > that your machine is an SGI UV one, is there any chance you could get a
> > > firmware fix for this? If possible, it would be also good to confirm
> > > that it's this chunk of code in setup_efi_vars(),
> > >
> > > status = efi_call_phys4(sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info,
> > > EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE |
> > > EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
> > > EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS, &store_size,
> > > &remaining_size, &var_size);
> >
> > This does trigger the problem. Note that the definition of
> > QueryVariableInfo() in the UEFI spec says:
> >
> > The returned MaximumVariableStorageSize, RemainingVariableStorageSize,
> > MaximumVariableSize information may change immediately after the call
> > based on other runtime activities including asynchronous error events.
> > Also, these values associated with different attributes are not
> > additive in nature.
> >
> > Note the values may be accurate at the point in time when returned,
> > but may not be after that.
> >
> > After the system has transitioned into runtime (after
> > ExitBootServices() is called), an implementation may not be able to
> > accurately return information about the Boot Services variable store.
> > In such cases, EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER should be returned.
> >
> > It is not clear to me exactly when ExitBootServices() is called.
> > Our bios is returning a failing indication on the call.
>
> Yes, but this call is clearly happening way before ExitBootServices() --
> see the surrounding code, see for example this in efi_main():
>
> [ ... snip ... ]
> setup_efi_vars(boot_params);
>
> setup_efi_pci(boot_params);
>
> status = efi_call_phys3(sys_table->boottime->allocate_pool,
> EFI_LOADER_DATA, sizeof(*gdt),
> (void **)&gdt);
> if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> efi_printk("Failed to alloc mem for gdt structure\n");
> goto fail;
> }
> [ ... snip ... ]
Yes. Note the failing call is sys_table->runtime while all the
other calls are sys_table->boottime and seem to work. Not sure
why the sys_table->runtime call has a problem but it may be
a clue. Could something in the runtime path not be set up???
> We are calling QueryVariableInfo() in setup_efi_vars(), and later on
> AllocatePool is being called (through boot table).
On my system the QueryVariableInfo() call fails, so AllocatePool()
is not called in setup_efi_vars().
> That'd inherently fail
> if we were calling it after ExitBootServices() has happened, but I believe
> that call is succeeding on your affected system as well.
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
--
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc rja@sgi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-29 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 16:27 [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code Russ Anderson
2013-05-23 11:58 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-23 20:32 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 7:43 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-24 11:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-24 11:40 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-24 16:11 ` Robin Holt
2013-05-24 17:02 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 21:05 ` Dave Jones
2013-05-27 4:27 ` joeyli
2013-05-27 4:32 ` joeyli
2013-05-28 2:43 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 20:05 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 20:11 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-24 20:49 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-28 10:50 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-28 10:53 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-28 8:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-29 21:01 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-29 22:22 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-29 22:46 ` Russ Anderson [this message]
2013-05-29 22:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-30 2:16 ` joeyli
2013-05-30 22:17 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-30 22:21 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-30 22:28 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-30 22:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 2:17 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 3:28 ` joeyli
2013-05-30 22:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 2:54 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 10:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-30 22:25 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 10:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 11:06 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 11:54 ` Josh Boyer
2013-05-31 12:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-31 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 14:34 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 14:42 ` James Bottomley
2013-05-31 14:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-31 14:48 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 15:43 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 16:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 17:35 ` James Bottomley
2013-05-31 22:57 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 22:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-31 23:30 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-06-01 0:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-01 4:20 ` Russ Anderson
2013-06-01 4:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-01 11:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-01 14:40 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-30 2:38 ` joeyli
2013-05-23 22:23 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 7:45 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-29 20:16 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 14:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130529224645.GA16582@sgi.com \
--to=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).