linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
	matt.fleming@intel.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:46:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130529224645.GA16582@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1305300018180.1111@twin.jikos.cz>

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:22:13AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013, Russ Anderson wrote:
> 
> > > What appears to be happening is that your the EFI runtime services code
> > > is calling into the EFI boot services code, which is definitely a bug in
> > > your firmware because we're at runtime, but we've seen other machines
> > > that do similar things so we usually handle it just fine. However, what
> > > makes your case different, and the reason you see the above splat, is
> > > that it's using the physical address of the EFI boot services region,
> > > not the virtual one we setup with SetVirtualAddressMap(). Which is a
> > > second firmware bug. Again, we have seen other machines that access
> > > physical addresses after SetVirtualAddressMap(), but until now we
> > > haven't had any non-optional code that triggered them.
> > > 
> > > The only reason I can see that the offending commit would introduce this
> > > problem is because it calls QueryVariableInfo() at boot time. I notice
> > > that your machine is an SGI UV one, is there any chance you could get a
> > > firmware fix for this? If possible, it would be also good to confirm
> > > that it's this chunk of code in setup_efi_vars(),
> > > 
> > > 	status = efi_call_phys4(sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info,
> > > 				EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE |
> > > 				EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS |
> > > 				EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS, &store_size,
> > > 				&remaining_size, &var_size);
> > 
> > This does trigger the problem.  Note that the definition of
> > QueryVariableInfo() in the UEFI spec says:
> > 
> >   The returned MaximumVariableStorageSize, RemainingVariableStorageSize,
> >   MaximumVariableSize information may change immediately after the call
> >   based on other runtime activities including asynchronous error events.
> >   Also, these values associated with different attributes are not
> >   additive in nature.
> > 
> > Note the values may be accurate at the point in time when returned,
> > but may not be after that.
> > 
> >   After the system has transitioned into runtime (after
> >   ExitBootServices() is called), an implementation may not be able to
> >   accurately return information about the Boot Services variable store.
> >   In such cases, EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER should be returned.
> > 
> > It is not clear to me exactly when ExitBootServices() is called.
> > Our bios is returning a failing indication on the call.
> 
> Yes, but this call is clearly happening way before ExitBootServices() -- 
> see the surrounding code, see for example this in efi_main():
> 
> [ ... snip ... ]
> 	setup_efi_vars(boot_params);
> 
> 	setup_efi_pci(boot_params);
> 
> 	status = efi_call_phys3(sys_table->boottime->allocate_pool,
> 				EFI_LOADER_DATA, sizeof(*gdt),
> 				(void **)&gdt);
> 	if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> 		efi_printk("Failed to alloc mem for gdt structure\n");
> 		goto fail;
> 	}
> [ ... snip ... ]

Yes.  Note the failing call is sys_table->runtime while all the
other calls are sys_table->boottime and seem to work.  Not sure
why the sys_table->runtime call has a problem but it may be
a clue.  Could something in the runtime path not be set up???

> We are calling QueryVariableInfo() in setup_efi_vars(), and later on 
> AllocatePool is being called (through boot table).

On my system the QueryVariableInfo() call fails, so AllocatePool()
is not called in setup_efi_vars().

>                                                    That'd inherently fail 
> if we were calling it after ExitBootServices() has happened, but I believe 
> that call is succeeding on your affected system as well.
> 
> -- 
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs

-- 
Russ Anderson, OS RAS/Partitioning Project Lead  
SGI - Silicon Graphics Inc          rja@sgi.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-29 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-22 16:27 [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code Russ Anderson
2013-05-23 11:58 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-23 20:32   ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24  7:43     ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-24 11:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-24 11:40         ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-24 16:11       ` Robin Holt
2013-05-24 17:02         ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 21:05           ` Dave Jones
2013-05-27  4:27             ` joeyli
2013-05-27  4:32               ` joeyli
2013-05-28  2:43               ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 20:05       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 20:11         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-24 20:49           ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-28 10:50             ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-28 10:53         ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-28  8:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-29 21:01       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-29 22:22         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-29 22:46           ` Russ Anderson [this message]
2013-05-29 22:53             ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-30  2:16               ` joeyli
2013-05-30 22:17                 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-30 22:21                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-30 22:28                     ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-30 22:30                       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31  2:17                         ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31  3:28                           ` joeyli
2013-05-30 22:32                       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31  2:54                         ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 10:06                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-30 22:25                   ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 10:12                     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 11:06                       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 11:40                         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 11:54                           ` Josh Boyer
2013-05-31 12:30                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-31 12:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 14:34                             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 14:42                               ` James Bottomley
2013-05-31 14:45                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-31 14:48                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 15:43                                   ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 16:28                                     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 17:35                                       ` James Bottomley
2013-05-31 22:57                                       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 22:59                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-31 23:30                                         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-06-01  0:03                                         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-01  4:20                                           ` Russ Anderson
2013-06-01  4:41                                             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-01 11:01                               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-01 14:40                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-30  2:38             ` joeyli
2013-05-23 22:23   ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24  7:45     ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-29 20:16       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 14:41         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130529224645.GA16582@sgi.com \
    --to=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).