Re: [PATCH] nohz: Prevent broadcast source from stealing full dynticks timekeeping duty

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:57:17PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 29 May 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > The timekeeping duty is currently assigned to the CPU that
> > handles the tick broadcast clock device by the time it is set in
> > one shot mode.
> > 
> > The reason for this is not entirely clear as outlined by Jiri
> > Bohac: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2302951/
> > 
> > One could speculate though that it makes sure only one CPU
> > is woken up to fixup the timekeeping max deferment. But the
> > timekeeper can change anytime after the broadcast CPU becomes
> > idle. So probably we can remove this as in Jiri's patch, but
> > not late in the -rc's.
> 
> Looking at commit 7300711e (clockevents: broadcast fixup possible
> waiters) which introduced that takeover, I really can't see a reason
> why we must do that. It's safe to remove it completely even now.

Yeah it seems so, if you're ok I can commit https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2302951/
with your ack and send another pull request.

Thanks.