linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:00:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130530150030.GF2864@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130529191249.19a235be@holzheu>

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 07:12:49PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:

[..]
> > > > So are you saying that s390 is ready to switch to mechanism of
> > > > creating ELF headers in first kernel by kexec-tools and new kernel
> > > > does not have to preare ELF headers?
> > > 
> > > No, I meant that currently nobody is using the kexec tools ELF
> > > header creation in the 1st kernel on s390. We create the ELF header
> > > in the 2nd kernel (mainly because of our cpuplugd issue).
> > > 
> > > Therefore, I think, we can safely change the ELF header creation in
> > > 2nd kernel to use your p_offset swap trick *and* we remove the swap
> > > code in the copy_oldmem_page() implementation (same kernel).
> > 
> > Ok. Got it. So s390 can fix it in kernel without creating any backward
> > compatibility issues (given the fact that nobody sees to be using
> > kexec-tools to build headers).
> > 
> > So please go ahead and fix it and that should solve your mmap() issue
> > too. Also please fix kexec-tools and that change will not be backward
> > compatible. 
> 
> Ok, I will do this.
> 
> I think we should add this "swap in ELF header" patch to the "kdump:
> Allow ELF header creation in new kernel" patch series (on top of the
> mmap patch series). Because when I remove the swap code from
> copy_oldmem_page(), the old trick to access the ELF header in the first
> kernel memory will no longer work.
> 
> Is that ok for you?

I am fine with both the patches in same series.

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-30 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-24 13:08 [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] kdump/mmap: Introduce arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/kdump/mmap: Implement arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore " Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 15:06   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 15:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 16:46       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 17:05         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-25 13:13           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 22:44       ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  0:33         ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25  3:01           ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  8:31             ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25 12:52               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-28 13:55                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 11:51                   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-29 16:23                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 17:12                       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-30 15:00                         ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-05-30 20:38                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-31 14:21                       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-31 16:01                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-03 13:27                           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-03 15:59                             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-03 16:48                               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-28 14:44                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-25 20:36               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130530150030.GF2864@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).