From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
trinity@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify list/idx mess in toggle_bp_slot() paths
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 21:45:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130601194548.GB27149@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130601194526.GA27149@redhat.com>
The enable/disable logic in toggle_bp_slot() is not symmetrical
and imho very confusing. "old_count" in toggle_bp_task_slot() is
actually new_count because this bp was already removed from the
list.
Change toggle_bp_slot() to always call list_add/list_del after
toggle_bp_task_slot(). This way old_idx is task_bp_pinned() and
this entry should be decremented, new_idx is +/-weight and we
need to increment this element. The code/logic looks obvious.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index ed31fe1..21a3c88 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -185,26 +185,20 @@ fetch_this_slot(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, int weight)
static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, bool enable,
enum bp_type_idx type, int weight)
{
- unsigned int *tsk_pinned;
- int old_count = 0;
- int old_idx = 0;
- int idx = 0;
-
- old_count = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type);
- old_idx = old_count - 1;
- idx = old_idx + weight;
-
- /* tsk_pinned[n] is the number of tasks having n breakpoints */
- tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned[type], cpu);
- if (enable) {
- tsk_pinned[idx]++;
- if (old_count > 0)
- tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
- } else {
- tsk_pinned[idx]--;
- if (old_count > 0)
- tsk_pinned[old_idx]++;
- }
+ /* tsk_pinned[n-1] is the number of tasks having n>0 breakpoints */
+ unsigned int *tsk_pinned = per_cpu(nr_task_bp_pinned[type], cpu);
+ int old_idx, new_idx;
+
+ old_idx = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type) - 1;
+ if (enable)
+ new_idx = old_idx + weight;
+ else
+ new_idx = old_idx - weight;
+
+ if (old_idx >= 0)
+ tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
+ if (new_idx >= 0)
+ tsk_pinned[new_idx]++;
}
/*
@@ -228,10 +222,6 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
}
/* Pinned counter task profiling */
-
- if (!enable)
- list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
-
if (cpu >= 0) {
toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, enable, type, weight);
} else {
@@ -241,6 +231,8 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
if (enable)
list_add_tail(&bp->hw.bp_list, &bp_task_head);
+ else
+ list_del(&bp->hw.bp_list);
}
/*
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-01 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-20 16:19 WARN_ONCE in arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c Vince Weaver
2013-05-28 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-28 17:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-28 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-29 16:32 ` [MAYBEPATCH] : " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 18:20 ` [PATCH 0/2]: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp_pinned(cpu) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-13 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw_breakpoint: Use cpu_possible_mask in {reserve,release}_bp_slot() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 12:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] hw_breakpoint: cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-06-15 12:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify list/idx mess in toggle_bp_slot() paths Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify the "weight" usage " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] hw_breakpoint: Introduce cpumask_of_bp() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-13 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] hw_breakpoint: cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-13 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-13 15:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-02 19:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] hw_breakpoint: more cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Simplify *register_wide_hw_breakpoint() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 0:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw_breakpoint: Introduce "struct bp_cpuinfo" Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-18 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 17:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-19 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130601194548.GB27149@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=trinity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox