From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
trinity@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify the "weight" usage in toggle_bp_slot() paths
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 21:46:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130601194606.GC27149@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130601194526.GA27149@redhat.com>
Change toggle_bp_slot() to make "weight" negative if !enable. This
way we can always use "+ weight" without additional "if (enable)"
check and toggle_bp_task_slot() no longer needs this arg.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
index 21a3c88..2f4d7c4 100644
--- a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ fetch_this_slot(struct bp_busy_slots *slots, int weight)
/*
* Add a pinned breakpoint for the given task in our constraint table
*/
-static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, bool enable,
+static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu,
enum bp_type_idx type, int weight)
{
/* tsk_pinned[n-1] is the number of tasks having n>0 breakpoints */
@@ -190,10 +190,7 @@ static void toggle_bp_task_slot(struct perf_event *bp, int cpu, bool enable,
int old_idx, new_idx;
old_idx = task_bp_pinned(cpu, bp, type) - 1;
- if (enable)
- new_idx = old_idx + weight;
- else
- new_idx = old_idx - weight;
+ new_idx = old_idx + weight;
if (old_idx >= 0)
tsk_pinned[old_idx]--;
@@ -211,22 +208,21 @@ toggle_bp_slot(struct perf_event *bp, bool enable, enum bp_type_idx type,
int cpu = bp->cpu;
struct task_struct *tsk = bp->hw.bp_target;
+ if (!enable)
+ weight = -weight;
+
/* Pinned counter cpu profiling */
if (!tsk) {
-
- if (enable)
- per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu) += weight;
- else
- per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], bp->cpu) -= weight;
+ per_cpu(nr_cpu_bp_pinned[type], cpu) += weight;
return;
}
/* Pinned counter task profiling */
if (cpu >= 0) {
- toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, enable, type, weight);
+ toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, type, weight);
} else {
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
- toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, enable, type, weight);
+ toggle_bp_task_slot(bp, cpu, type, weight);
}
if (enable)
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-01 19:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-20 16:19 WARN_ONCE in arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c Vince Weaver
2013-05-28 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-28 17:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-28 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-05-29 16:32 ` [MAYBEPATCH] : " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 18:20 ` [PATCH 0/2]: " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Fix cpu check in task_bp_pinned(cpu) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-13 14:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw_breakpoint: Use cpu_possible_mask in {reserve,release}_bp_slot() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 12:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] hw_breakpoint: cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-01 19:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify list/idx mess in toggle_bp_slot() paths Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 12:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-06-15 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] hw_breakpoint: Simplify the "weight" usage " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-01 19:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] hw_breakpoint: Introduce cpumask_of_bp() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-13 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] hw_breakpoint: cleanups Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-13 15:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-13 15:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-02 19:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] hw_breakpoint: more cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] hw_breakpoint: Simplify *register_wide_hw_breakpoint() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 0:12 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-02 19:50 ` [PATCH 2/2] hw_breakpoint: Introduce "struct bp_cpuinfo" Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-18 14:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 17:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-19 15:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130601194606.GC27149@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=trinity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox