public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Linux EFI <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, X86-ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:54:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130603145412.GJ2004@console-pimps.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130603143252.GB20252@srcf.ucam.org>

On Mon, 03 Jun, at 03:32:52PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> We can only pass one set of addresses to SetVirtualAddressMap(), but it 
> doesn't seem like there's any intrinsic reason we can't the runtime 
> regions mapped to multiple virtual addresses.

Indeed. That's the approach I took with my 1:1 series from last year. If
Windows is mapping things at higher addresses like you said, then
they're probably doing the same.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-02 12:56 [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping Borislav Petkov
2013-06-02 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] efi: Convert runtime services function ptrs Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 10:07   ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-11  6:49     ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-11  9:33       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-02 12:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86, cpa: Map in an arbitrary pgd Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 10:22   ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-06 13:24     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 13:30       ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-06 13:33         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-02 12:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86, efi: Add an efi= kernel command line parameter Borislav Petkov
2013-06-04 12:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 10:42   ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-06 13:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 13:36       ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-06 17:50       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-06 18:51         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 19:35           ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-06 19:41             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 19:54               ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-06 20:07                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 20:18                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-06 20:27                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 20:30                       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-06 20:44                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 20:50                           ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-06 21:02                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 21:03                               ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-02 12:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86, efi: Map runtime services 1:1 Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 13:14   ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-06 13:29     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 15:58       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 19:28         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-06 19:36           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-06 19:38             ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-10 12:55               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-02 22:56 ` [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03  8:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-03 14:27     ` James Bottomley
2013-06-03 14:30       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03 14:38         ` James Bottomley
2013-06-03 15:21           ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03 16:18             ` James Bottomley
2013-06-03 16:24               ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03 16:35                 ` James Bottomley
2013-06-03 16:42                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03 18:05                     ` James Bottomley
2013-06-03 18:11                       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03 21:19                         ` James Bottomley
2013-06-03 21:29                           ` Matthew Garrett
2014-02-10  3:59                     ` Linux, UEFI, and Chromebooks (was RE: [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping) Yuhong Bao
2013-06-03 14:32     ` [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping Matthew Garrett
2013-06-03 14:54       ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2013-06-04  8:15         ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130603145412.GJ2004@console-pimps.org \
    --to=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox