linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:59:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130603155940.GA6714@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130603152718.5ba4d05f@holzheu>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:

[..]
> > If not, how would remap_pfn_range() work with HSA region when
> > /proc/vmcore is mmaped()?
> 
> I am no memory management expert, so I discussed that with Martin
> Schwidefsky (s390 architecture maintainer). Perhaps something like
> the following could work:
> 
> After vmcore_mmap() is called the HSA pages are not initially mapped in
> the page tables. So when user space accesses those parts
> of /proc/vmcore, a fault will be generated. We implement a mechanism
> that in this case the HSA is copied to a new page in the page cache and
> a mapping is created for it. Since the page is allocated in the page
> cache, it can be released afterwards by the kernel when we get memory
> pressure.
> 
> Our current idea for such an implementation:
> 
> * Create new address space (struct address_space) for /proc/vmcore.
> * Implement new vm_operations_struct "vmcore_mmap_ops" with
>   new vmcore_fault() ".fault" callback for /proc/vmcore.
> * Set vma->vm_ops to vmcore_mmap_ops in mmap_vmcore().
> * The vmcore_fault() function will get a new page cache page,
>   copy HSA page to page cache page add it to vmcore address space.
>   To see how this could work, we looked into the functions
>   filemap_fault() in "mm/filemap.c" and relay_buf_fault() in
>   "kernel/relay.c".
> 
> What do you think?

I am not mm expert either but above proposal sounds reasonable to me.

So remap_pfn_range() call will go in arch dependent code so that arch
can decide which range can be mapped right away and which ranges will
be filed in when fault happens? I am assuming that s390 will map
everything except for pfn between 0 and HSA_SIZE.

And regular s390 kdump will map everyting right away and will not
have to rely on fault mechanism?

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-24 13:08 [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] kdump/mmap: Introduce arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/kdump/mmap: Implement arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore " Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 15:06   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 15:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 16:46       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 17:05         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-25 13:13           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 22:44       ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  0:33         ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25  3:01           ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  8:31             ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25 12:52               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-28 13:55                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 11:51                   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-29 16:23                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 17:12                       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-30 15:00                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-30 20:38                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-31 14:21                       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-31 16:01                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-03 13:27                           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-03 15:59                             ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-06-03 16:48                               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-28 14:44                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-25 20:36               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130603155940.GA6714@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=zhangyanfei.yes@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).