[GIT PULL] extcon-next for 3.10

[GIT PULL] extcon-next for 3.10

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Greg,

This is extcon-next pull request for 3.10.
Please pull extcon with following updates.

Best regards and Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi

The following changes since commit e4aa937ec75df0eea0bee03bffa3303ad36c986b:

  Linux 3.10-rc3 (2013-05-26 16:00:47 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git extcon-next-for-3.10

for you to fetch changes up to ce636025d872947bff154682c610cedd551b1d1e:

  extcon: Palmas Extcon Driver (2013-05-28 11:41:44 +0900)

----------------------------------------------------------------
extcon: updates for v3.10

This patchset two patchs as following:

New extcon drvier for Palmas device
- Add new extcon driver for Palmas which is USB tranceiver device
Modify performission /sys/class/extcon/[device name]/'state' sysfs entry
- Modify permission of sysfs entry from read/write to only read

----------------------------------------------------------------
Chanwoo Choi (1):
      extcon: Change permission 'state' sysfs entry (rw -> r)

Graeme Gregory (1):
      extcon: Palmas Extcon Driver

 .../devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-twl.txt      |  15 ++
 drivers/extcon/Kconfig                             |   7 +
 drivers/extcon/Makefile                            |   1 +
 drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c                      |  23 +-
 drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c                     | 246 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/mfd/palmas.h                         |  26 ++-
 6 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-twl.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c

Re: [GIT PULL] extcon-next for 3.10

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 02:25:46PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> This is extcon-next pull request for 3.10.

What?  A new driver so late in the release cycle?  No, I can not accept
that at all.

I will be glad to queue it up for 3.11, but not for 3.10, sorry.

Please be more aware of the development lifecycle please, this is the
second time I have had to reject your pull requests for this same
reason.

greg k-h