From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftrace: Use schedule_on_each_cpu() as a heavy synchronize_sched()
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:30:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130604123011.GG14973@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370347881.26799.114.camel@gandalf.local.home>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:11:21AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-04 at 13:03 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > If ftrace were to use rcu_dereference_sched() instead of rcu_dereference_raw(), I guess
> > the issue would have been detected before. But I guess we want to avoid that for
> > tracing recursion?
>
> It's been detected before, just ignored as most of ftrace function
> tracing has permanent objects and the synchronization doesn't really
> matter for them. But for perf and SystemTap that uses dynamically
> created ftrace_ops and needs to free them, it does make a difference.
> Something I knew needed to be fixed but never got around to it as the
> race is extremely tight (and requires root user trying to trigger it). I
> haven't been ably to trigger the race, but in theory it's there.
>
> Note the checks that rcu_dereference_sched() has to test for these kinds
> of things would cause ftrace to live lock the system if it had used it.
> In fact, I had to make a rcu_dereference_raw_notrace() to prevent ftrace
> locking up the system when full rcu debugging is enabled.
I see.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-04 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-29 0:01 [RFC][PATCH] ftrace: Use schedule_on_each_cpu() as a heavy synchronize_sched() Steven Rostedt
2013-05-29 7:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-29 13:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-29 13:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-05-29 13:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-19 1:56 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-06-19 2:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-19 7:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-05-29 8:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-04 11:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-06-04 12:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-04 12:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2013-06-05 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-05 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130604123011.GG14973@somewhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox