From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Stoffregen <paul@pjrc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: cdc-acm: remove unneeded spin_lock_irqsave/restore on write path
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:41:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130607184100.GA7139@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B228A6.3010908@cogentembedded.com>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:38:30PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 06/07/2013 10:32 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> >From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> >When writing data we were:
> > lock
> > do some work
> > unlock
> > call function
> > lock
> > do some work
> > unlock
> > return
> > return
> >
> >It turns out, that "function" was only ever called in the one place, so
> >instead of locking/unlocking for no good reason, just inline the
> >function and only grab the lock once.
> >
> >This has sped up the pathological case of sending 1 byte packets to a
> >loop-back cdc-acm device from 49600 bytes per second to 50100 bytes a
> >second on my workstation. A tiny increase yes, but noticable, and now
> >the spinlock isn't the hottest thing on the perf graph anymore. Yes, we
> >are still waiting for the hardware for the most part, but getting rid of
> >a spin_lock_irqsave() call for every packet is still a good thing.
> >
> >And we end up deleting lines of code, always a win overall.
> >
> >This was found by using a Teensy 3.0 device and the test program and
> >firmware located at:
> > http://www.pjrc.com/teensy/benchmark_usb_serial_receive.html
> >
> >Reported-by: Paul Stoffregen <paul@pjrc.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >
> >---
> > drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c | 51 +++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
> >--- a/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> >+++ b/drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> [...]
> >@@ -653,13 +621,30 @@ static int acm_tty_write(struct tty_stru
> > }
> > wb = &acm->wb[wbn];
> >+ if (!acm->dev) {
> >+ wb->use = 0;
> >+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
> >+ return -ENODEV;
> >+ }
> >+
> > count = (count > acm->writesize) ? acm->writesize : count;
> > dev_vdbg(&acm->data->dev, "%s - write %d\n", __func__, count);
> > memcpy(wb->buf, buf, count);
> > wb->len = count;
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
> >- stat = acm_write_start(acm, wbn);
> >+ usb_autopm_get_interface_async(acm->control);
> >+ if (acm->susp_count) {
> >+ if (!acm->delayed_wb)
> >+ acm->delayed_wb = wb;
> >+ else
> >+ usb_autopm_put_interface_async(acm->control);
> >+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acm->write_lock, flags);
>
> But you've already dropped it above the *if* and not taken again?
Oops, it needs to move down a bit further, let me respin this...
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 18:32 [PATCH] USB: cdc-acm: remove unneeded spin_lock_irqsave/restore on write path Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-07 18:38 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-07 18:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-06-07 18:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130607184100.GA7139@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=paul@pjrc.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox