* Re: kernel/workqueue.c:4435:61: sparse: expression using sizeof bool [not found] ` <20130607220351.GE14781@mtj.dyndns.org> @ 2013-06-07 23:50 ` Fengguang Wu [not found] ` <20130607184614.45418364.akpm@linux-foundation.org> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-06-07 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Andrew Morton, kbuild-all, Christopher Li, Dan Carpenter, LKML On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:03:51PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 02:15:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > 4434 /* copy worker description */ > > > > 4435 probe_kernel_read(&desc_valid, &worker->desc_valid, sizeof(desc_valid)); > > > > I don't understand the rationale for the sparse test, really. This > > code seems unproblematic. > > Yeah, I've gotten that warning a couple times now and am just ignoring > it at this point. Maybe the standard says bool isn't a proper > integeral type and its size isn't precisely defined or something? I > don't know. Hmm, I'd better disable the warnings that are normally ignored anyway.. Thanks, Fengguang ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20130607184614.45418364.akpm@linux-foundation.org>]
[parent not found: <20130608020549.GN14781@mtj.dyndns.org>]
* Re: kernel/workqueue.c:4435:61: sparse: expression using sizeof bool [not found] ` <20130608020549.GN14781@mtj.dyndns.org> @ 2013-06-08 2:15 ` Fengguang Wu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-06-08 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: Andrew Morton, kbuild-all, Christopher Li, LKML // CC sparse people. On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:05:49PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Andrew. > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 06:46:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I believe sizeof(bool) can vary between compilers (on gcc it's 1) but > > that doesn't matter here. > > Looking at the warning, I originally suspected that maybe the standard > was crazy enough to allow mixed usages of different sizes for bool as > the compiler sees fit. Just scanned the spec, nothing that insane. > It's a proper integeral type, so I'm now more puzzled why sparse is > warning about sizeof(bool). > > > sizeof(enum) can vary between compilers as well. In fact I've seen a > > compiler which used 2 if the enumerated values were 0..65535, and 4 > > otherwise. So warning about sizeof(enum) would be a bit more useful > > than about sizeof(bool). > > Oh yeah, gcc does that too. If the enum definition contains a number > larger than 32bit, it'll grow it to 64bit. > > #include <stdio.h> > > enum { ENUM_A = 1LU }; > enum { ENUM_B = 1LU << 31 }; > enum { ENUM_C = 1LU << 32 }; > > int main(void) > { > printf("%zu %zu %zu\n", sizeof(ENUM_A), sizeof(ENUM_B), sizeof(ENUM_C)); > return 0; > } > > $ ./a.out > 4 4 8 > > Whether sparse should trigger a warning on it, I don't know. > > Thanks. > > -- > tejun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-08 2:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <51afd3ac.1kKgJcnM4PAV+Agb%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20130607141521.4000962d5ac0d7fcd54800cf@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20130607220351.GE14781@mtj.dyndns.org>
2013-06-07 23:50 ` kernel/workqueue.c:4435:61: sparse: expression using sizeof bool Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20130607184614.45418364.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20130608020549.GN14781@mtj.dyndns.org>
2013-06-08 2:15 ` Fengguang Wu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox