From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: Arm sub architectures missing clk_round_rate()
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 10:21:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130608092133.GI18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B2F1ED.2090801@kernel.org>
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 09:57:17AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> At least one Arm subarch (pxa) does no provide an implementation of this
> function. As far as I can see there is no way for a driver wishing to use
> it to detect it's absence. This is marked in clk.h as being optional
> for 'Machine Class support'. Obvious solutions to this are:
>
> 1) It is effectively only usable by platform specific drivers as no
> more generic driver can know it is available. Perhaps even a stub that
> returns an appropriate error would be acceptable.
>
> 2) It is not as optional as the header implies and should always be implemented
> if the rest of the clk framework is.
>
> 3) There should be some means of detecting its absense so that drivers can
> be dependant on its presene.
>
> Which is the correct one?
The right answer is (2) now that we have things like the clk framework and
soo many users.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-08 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-08 8:57 Arm sub architectures missing clk_round_rate() Jonathan Cameron
2013-06-08 9:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-06-08 9:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-06-08 10:14 ` Haojian Zhuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130608092133.GI18614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox