From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753360Ab3FIPfp (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:35:45 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([80.244.247.6]:54129 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751364Ab3FIPfo (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jun 2013 11:35:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:35:30 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Bjorn Helgaas , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/27] x86, irq: kill create_irq() Message-ID: <20130609153530.GE2245@breakpoint.cc> References: <1370644273-10495-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1370644273-10495-9-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370644273-10495-9-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 03:30:54PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > create_irq() will return -1 when failing to allocate. > create_irq_nr() will return 0 when failing to allocate. > > It only causes confusion. > > Now we have no user for create_irq(), so remove create_irq() for x86. Oh thank you so much. That is what I just asked for :) Sebastian