Re: Another RCU trace. (3.10-rc5)

[Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:37:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 > On Mon, 2013-06-10 at 14:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
 > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:01:23PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:33:55PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
 > > > 
 > > >  > > I saw some of Steven's patches get merged on Friday, is there anything else
 > > >  > > outstanding that didn't make it in yet that I could test ?
 > > >  > > Or is this another new bug ?
 > > >  > 
 > > >  > I have three fixes queued up at:
 > > >  > 
 > > >  > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git rcu/urgent
 > > >  > 
 > > >  > Kind of hard to tell whether they are relevant given the interleaved
 > > >  > stack traces, but can't hurt to try them out.
 > > > 
 > > > Here's another. Looks different.
 > > 
 > > I bet that commit d6284099 (trace: Allow idle-safe tracepoints to be
 > > called from irq) from the above git archive fixes this one.  Just don't
 > > ask how much I am willing to bet.  ;-)
 > 
 > Don't bet much ;-)  This has nothing to do with tracepoints. It's due to
 > the function tracer. 

dammit, 20 minutes after I finally cloned the repo.
Can we go back to posting diffs instead of hashes please ?

So while updating my list of bugs I've found this cycle, I noticed
I'd already posted this one a month ago on -rc2.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/21/327
which led us to this patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/24/379
After which I hit a bunch of what seem to be other RCU related bugs.

So maybe that patch was a winner after all and got dropped ?

	Dave