From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755073Ab3FLF5P (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:57:15 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:46351 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754653Ab3FLF5O (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:57:14 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,848,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="348540155" Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:47:26 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spear-devel , viresh.kumar@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann , Felipe Balbi Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dw_dmac: move to own folder and split Message-ID: <20130612051726.GC4107@intel.com> References: <1370435206-13474-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1370954397.29283.329.camel@smile> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1370954397.29283.329.camel@smile> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 03:39:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 15:26 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > This is split of the dw_dmac driver as suggested by Arnd et al [1,2]. > > There are three most important patches: > > 2/4 moves driver to its own folder > > 3/4 does the actual split > > 4/4 introduces PCI part of the driver > > > > During this files are renamed: mostly means that dw_dmac prefix is eliminated. > > I hope to get it ready to be included in v3.11. > > > > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1408174.html > > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1408495.html > > > > Changes v1->v2: > > - address Arnd's comments > > - compile test when !CONFIG_PM > > - apply ACKs > > > > Cnages v0->v1: > > - apply Viresh's ACKs > > - append PCI part of the driver > > - test altogether on Intel Medfield > > - add 1/4 to the series as it based on it, but Vinod didn't apply it yet to > > his tree. > > Vinod, do you have any comments on this? Looks good, just a minor nitpcik on 2nd one... > > We would like to have this scheduled for v3.11. > I think we still have few days if you think we need to improve this > patchset. Sure,... -- ~Vinod