From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Percpu tag allocator
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:21:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130613192152.GC13970@mtj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130613121324.2cab80256217df97254af16c@linux-foundation.org>
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:13:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> As I understand it, if a task is stuck in this loop at freeze time, the
> whole freeze attempt will fail. But it's been a long time since I
> thought about or worked on this stuff.
It depends on who's calling the allocator but if the device driver or
its midlayer is doing things properly, the ideal way would be the task
being marked unfreezable (I think freezable kthreads harms more than
help in general) and the driver suspend callback draining commands
while not issuing new ones. What the tag allocator does doesn't
really matter as all resources necessary for command execution should
eventually be freed before entering suspend anyway.
If that's not the case, the freezing should still be controlled by the
caller and again the allocator should be able to return -EBUSY/INTR to
indicate and then the caller, after releasing all other resources,
shouldf to try_to_freeze(). There simply is no reliable way to tell
from as deep as tag allocator whether it'd be safe to freeze or not.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-12 4:03 [PATCH] Percpu tag allocator Kent Overstreet
2013-06-12 17:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-12 17:59 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-06-12 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-12 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 2:05 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-06-13 3:03 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 3:54 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-06-13 5:46 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 19:04 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 19:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 19:23 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 19:35 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 22:30 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 23:13 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 23:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-19 1:32 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-06-13 19:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2013-06-13 19:09 ` Jeff Layton
2013-06-13 21:53 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-06-13 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-13 19:21 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-06-13 21:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2013-06-13 21:50 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 21:58 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130613192152.GC13970@mtj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=koverstreet@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox