From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] s390/vmcore: Use ELF header in new memory feature
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:16:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130614191649.GN12023@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370624161-2298-3-git-send-email-holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 06:55:58PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
[..]
> /*
> - * Create kdump ELF core header in new kernel, if it has not been passed via
> - * the "elfcorehdr" kernel parameter
> + * Free ELF core header (new kernel)
> */
> -static int setup_kdump_elfcorehdr(void)
> +void elfcorehdr_free(void)
> {
I was hoping that we will pass the value returned by elfcorehdr_alloc()
here. Something along the lines of kmalloc() and kfree().
elfcorehdr_addr = elfcorhdr_alloc();
...
...
elfcorhdr_free(elfcorhdr_addr);
Only odd part here is that arch will not set elfcorehdr_addr=NULL as there
are functions like is_kdump_kernel() which depend on it being set.
That might be a separate cleanup thought and we can put a comment after
elfcorhdr_free() and explain that oddity.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-14 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 16:55 [PATCH v5 0/5] kdump: Allow ELF header creation in new kernel Michael Holzheu
2013-06-07 16:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] vmcore: Introduce ELF header in new memory feature Michael Holzheu
2013-06-10 13:35 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-10 13:53 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-14 18:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-21 14:17 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-27 19:32 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-27 20:10 ` Cliff Wickman
2013-06-27 20:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-28 8:15 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-07-01 17:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-07-01 18:29 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-07 16:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] s390/vmcore: Use " Michael Holzheu
2013-06-10 13:36 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-10 13:48 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-14 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-06-07 16:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] vmcore: Introduce remap_oldmem_pfn_range() Michael Holzheu
[not found] ` <CAJGZr0+_W0dp2f9VtVAiUT2fqiwe91gHXd9zYzfMMzBZSZogww@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-10 8:00 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-10 13:40 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-10 14:03 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-10 15:37 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-11 12:42 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-12 9:13 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-13 1:32 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-13 8:54 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-13 4:00 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-11 13:20 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-07 16:56 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] s390/vmcore: Implement remap_oldmem_pfn_range for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-06-14 20:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-07 16:56 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] s390/vmcore: Use vmcore for zfcpdump Michael Holzheu
2013-06-11 23:47 ` HATAYAMA Daisuke
2013-06-12 9:14 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-14 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] kdump: Allow ELF header creation in new kernel Vivek Goyal
2013-06-21 13:39 ` Michael Holzheu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130614191649.GN12023@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox