From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] fput: turn "list_head delayed_fput_list" into llist_head
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:30:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130615173039.GA15058@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130615172959.GA14656@redhat.com>
fput() and delayed_fput() can use llist and avoid the locking.
This is unlikely path, it is not that this change can improve
the performance, but this way the code looks simpler.
Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
fs/file_table.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file_table.c b/fs/file_table.c
index 3a2bbc5..94b1bfa 100644
--- a/fs/file_table.c
+++ b/fs/file_table.c
@@ -265,18 +265,15 @@ static void __fput(struct file *file)
mntput(mnt);
}
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(delayed_fput_lock);
-static LIST_HEAD(delayed_fput_list);
+static LLIST_HEAD(delayed_fput_list);
static void delayed_fput(struct work_struct *unused)
{
- LIST_HEAD(head);
- spin_lock_irq(&delayed_fput_lock);
- list_splice_init(&delayed_fput_list, &head);
- spin_unlock_irq(&delayed_fput_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&head)) {
- struct file *f = list_first_entry(&head, struct file, f_u.fu_list);
- list_del_init(&f->f_u.fu_list);
- __fput(f);
+ struct llist_node *node = llist_del_all(&delayed_fput_list);
+ struct llist_node *next;
+
+ for (; node; node = next) {
+ next = llist_next(node);
+ __fput(llist_entry(node, struct file, f_u.fu_llist));
}
}
@@ -306,7 +303,6 @@ void fput(struct file *file)
{
if (atomic_long_dec_and_test(&file->f_count)) {
struct task_struct *task = current;
- unsigned long flags;
file_sb_list_del(file);
if (likely(!in_interrupt() && !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD))) {
@@ -320,10 +316,9 @@ void fput(struct file *file)
* fput to avoid leaking *file.
*/
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&delayed_fput_lock, flags);
- list_add(&file->f_u.fu_list, &delayed_fput_list);
- schedule_work(&delayed_fput_work);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&delayed_fput_lock, flags);
+
+ if (llist_add(&file->f_u.fu_llist, &delayed_fput_list))
+ schedule_work(&delayed_fput_work);
}
}
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 43db02e..8a60d99 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/stat.h>
#include <linux/cache.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/llist.h>
#include <linux/radix-tree.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -767,6 +768,7 @@ struct file {
*/
union {
struct list_head fu_list;
+ struct llist_node fu_llist;
struct rcu_head fu_rcuhead;
} f_u;
struct path f_path;
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-15 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 19:09 [PATCH 0/2] fix ->shm_file leak Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-14 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-14 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-15 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] (Was: fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work()) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 17:30 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-06-15 17:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] llist: fix/simplify llist_add() and llist_add_batch() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] llist: llist_add() can use llist_add_batch() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 17:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] (Was: fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work()) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-14 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] move exit_task_namespaces() outside of exit_notify() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130615173039.GA15058@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox