From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] llist: fix/simplify llist_add() and llist_add_batch()
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 19:30:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130615173043.GA15065@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130615172959.GA14656@redhat.com>
1. This is mostly theoretical, but llist_add*() need ACCESS_ONCE().
Otherwise it is not guaranteed that the first cmpxchg() uses the
same value for old_entry and new_last->next.
2. These helpers cache the result of cmpxchg() and read the initial
value of head->first before the main loop. I do not think this
makes sense. In the likely case cmpxchg() succeeds, otherwise
it doesn't hurt to reload head->first.
I think it would be better to simplify the code and simply read
->first before cmpxchg().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/llist.h | 19 +++++++------------
lib/llist.c | 15 +++++----------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/llist.h b/include/linux/llist.h
index a5199f6..3e2b969 100644
--- a/include/linux/llist.h
+++ b/include/linux/llist.h
@@ -151,18 +151,13 @@ static inline struct llist_node *llist_next(struct llist_node *node)
*/
static inline bool llist_add(struct llist_node *new, struct llist_head *head)
{
- struct llist_node *entry, *old_entry;
-
- entry = head->first;
- for (;;) {
- old_entry = entry;
- new->next = entry;
- entry = cmpxchg(&head->first, old_entry, new);
- if (entry == old_entry)
- break;
- }
-
- return old_entry == NULL;
+ struct llist_node *first;
+
+ do {
+ new->next = first = ACCESS_ONCE(head->first);
+ } while (cmpxchg(&head->first, first, new) != first);
+
+ return !first;
}
/**
diff --git a/lib/llist.c b/lib/llist.c
index 4a15115..4a70d12 100644
--- a/lib/llist.c
+++ b/lib/llist.c
@@ -39,18 +39,13 @@
bool llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first, struct llist_node *new_last,
struct llist_head *head)
{
- struct llist_node *entry, *old_entry;
+ struct llist_node *first;
- entry = head->first;
- for (;;) {
- old_entry = entry;
- new_last->next = entry;
- entry = cmpxchg(&head->first, old_entry, new_first);
- if (entry == old_entry)
- break;
- }
+ do {
+ new_last->next = first = ACCESS_ONCE(head->first);
+ } while (cmpxchg(&head->first, first, new_first) != first);
- return old_entry == NULL;
+ return !first;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(llist_add_batch);
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-15 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 19:09 [PATCH 0/2] fix ->shm_file leak Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-14 19:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-14 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-15 17:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] (Was: fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work()) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 17:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] fput: turn "list_head delayed_fput_list" into llist_head Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 17:30 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-06-15 17:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] llist: llist_add() can use llist_add_batch() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-15 17:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] (Was: fput: task_work_add() can fail if the caller has passed exit_task_work()) Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-14 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] move exit_task_namespaces() outside of exit_notify() Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130615173043.GA15065@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox