Re: [PATCH 0/4] [resend] n_tty fixes

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 07:28:27AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 03/19/2013 10:10 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:57:09AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 16:15 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 08:38:22AM -0500, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>>> minimum_to_wake is unique to N_TTY processing, and belongs in
> >>>> per-ldisc data.
> >>>>
> >>>> Add the ldisc method, ldisc_ops::fasync(), to notify line disciplines
> >>>> when signal-driven I/O is enabled or disabled. When enabled for N_TTY
> >>>> (by fcntl(F_SETFL, O_ASYNC)), blocking reader/polls will be woken
> >>>> for any readable input. When disabled, blocking reader/polls are not
> >>>> woken until the read buffer is full.
> >>>>
> >>>> Canonical mode (L_ICANON(tty), n_tty_data::icanon) is not affected by
> >>>> the minimum_to_wake setting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
> >>>
> >>> For some reason, this patch doesn't apply.  Care to refresh this one,
> >>> and the rest in this series, and resend?
> >>
> >> Sorry. There was probably some accidental dependency on one of the other
> >> patchsets of mine you did apply.
> >>
> >> This and patch 5 now apply without error to tty-next.
> > 
> > Ok, but they are now long gone from my queue.  Can you please resend
> > what I haven't applied?
> 
> Greg,
> 
> I resent these back on 19 Mar but they never got applied. (maybe because
> I resent them as 4,5,6 & 7/7 ??)

Yes, they were burried, sorry about that :)

> Anyway, these apply cleanly to tty-next.

Now applied, thanks.

greg k-h