Re: [ANNOUNCE] Full dynticks selftests 0.0.1

[Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:17:33AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 06:22:57PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:15:20AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:20:35PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Here it is, a very basic test that runs a userspace loop for ten seconds and dumps a trace
> > > > > of the tick, scheduler, workqueue, and other kind of kernel noise.
> > > > 
> > > > Excellent. Ticks are finally off here. Also has useful instructions on how
> > > > to figure out if something was wrong. The number of >1 microsecond
> > > > disturbances went down from 110 per second to 2.
> > > 
> > > Very cool!
> > > 
> > > Frederic, is the git tree mentioned in your email permanent?  If so, I
> > > will add it to the documentation.
> > 
> > Yep, it should be permanent.
> 
> How about the following?
> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> nohz_full: Add testing information to documentation
> 
> This commit adds information about testing nohz_full, and also emphasizes
> the fact that you need a multi-CPU system to get any benefit from nohz_full.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

Nice!

Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>