public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the driver-core.current tree
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:36:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130619163628.GA28672@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVObBDwaounzZ7RyF=+QrQCBoEd0s-uLYFokksOzKgZSjA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:04:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:58:39PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >> > Hi Greg,
> >> >
> >> > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> >> > drivers/base/firmware_class.c between commit 875979368eb4 ("firmware
> >> > loader: fix use-after-free by double abort") from the driver-core.current
> >> > tree and commit fe304143b0c3 ("firmware: Avoid deadlock of usermodehelper
> >> > lock at shutdown") from the driver-core tree.
> >> >
> >> > I fixed it up (more may be required - see below) and can carry the fix as
> >> > necessary (no action is required).
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> >> >
> >> > diff --cc drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> >> > index 01e2103,6ede229..0000000
> >> > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
> >> > @@@ -446,22 -452,11 +452,18 @@@ static struct firmware_priv *to_firmwar
> >> >         return container_of(dev, struct firmware_priv, dev);
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> > - static void fw_load_abort(struct firmware_priv *fw_priv)
> >> > + static void fw_load_abort(struct firmware_buf *buf)
> >> >   {
> >> > -       struct firmware_buf *buf = fw_priv->buf;
> >> > -
> >> >  +      /*
> >> >  +       * There is a small window in which user can write to 'loading'
> >> >  +       * between loading done and disappearance of 'loading'
> >> >  +       */
> >> >  +      if (test_bit(FW_STATUS_DONE, &buf->status))
> >> >  +              return;
> >> >  +
> >> > +       list_del_init(&buf->pending_list);
> >> >         set_bit(FW_STATUS_ABORT, &buf->status);
> >> >         complete_all(&buf->completion);
> >> > -
> >> > -       /* avoid user action after loading abort */
> >> > -       fw_priv->buf = NULL;
> >>
> >> Hmm, maybe the most important part in the commit 875979368eb4
> >> ("firmware loader: fix use-after-free by double abort") has been removed, :-)
> >>
> >> In fact, the commit 87597936 is for linus tree only because it is a fix,
> >> so the conflict is caused by merging it with other firmware loader patches
> >> in -next tree.
> >>
> >> Greg, I can figure out one patch for -next easily, but it depends you
> >> push it on 3.10-rc or 3.11-rc.
> >
> > I'll be pushing your patch for 3.10-final to Linus as it fixes a bug,
> > but I will need something to resolve the merge issue properly.  Can you
> > provide me that patch/merge?
> 
> OK, I can send you one patch, but I am wondering the patch is against
> today's next tree or your driver-core/driver-core-next?
> 
> If it is against your driver-core/driver-core-next, would you mind letting
> me know how to generate the patch for the conflict?  Sorry for the stupid
> question, because I seldom meet such problem, :-(

Can you merge the two branches together (driver-core-next and
driver-core-linus) and send me the proper merge patch that I should be
applying when doing that?  Then I can push that out through the
driver-core-next tree to make linux-next work properly, as well as make
the merge sane for me when I pull in the final 3.10 release.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-19 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-19  5:32 linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the driver-core.current tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-19  5:55 ` Greg KH
2013-06-19  6:58 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-19 14:39   ` Greg KH
2013-06-19 15:04     ` Ming Lei
2013-06-19 16:36       ` Greg KH [this message]
2013-06-20  0:23         ` Ming Lei
2013-06-20  1:06           ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-20  1:22             ` Ming Lei
2013-06-20  3:28               ` Greg KH
2013-06-20  3:46                 ` Ming Lei
2013-06-20  3:49                 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-19  7:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-19  7:21   ` Ming Lei
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-07  4:29 Stephen Rothwell
2026-01-07 14:38 ` Danilo Krummrich
2020-04-30  4:25 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-30  8:15 ` Greg KH
2013-12-09  3:47 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-09  8:21 ` Greg KH
2012-02-03  3:51 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-03 15:07 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130619163628.GA28672@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox