From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Adding support for ARINC429 into the Linux kernel
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:45:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201306192345.31106.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619202954.GA5594@roeck-us.net>
On Wednesday 19 June 2013, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I have been asked to explore options for adding ARINC 429 support [1]
> into the Linux kernel, primarily to support devices from Holt Integrated
> Circuits [2] (the request is unrelated to the chip manufacturer).
>
> ARINC429 is a protocol which is widely used in commercial airplanes.
>
> There are various chips supporting this protocol available, as well as
> out-of-tree Linux support. The drivers I have looked at implement it
> either as character device or misc device and typically pass raw receive
> data to userspace.
>
> I can see a number of options for going forward:
> 1) Implement as character device (or possibly misc device) and pass
> raw data to/from user space
> 1a) Just implement a driver for the specific chips
> 2b) Implement some kind of generic infrastructure
> 2) Implement as network driver with a new address family, similar to,
> say, AF_CAN.
>
> Any thoughts / suggestions which approach would be better and, most of all,
> which approach might have a better chance of being accepted upstream ?
Since this is a standard protocol, a driver that just supports a specific
chip (1a) would be the worst option IMHO.
A character device and a network protocol both sound reasonable, but
it really depends on the use cases:
* Does Linux act both as the sender and receiver, or do you want to
support just one of the cases (which?)?
* Would you expect to always just transfer a single 32-bit word, or
are there larger chunks of logically contigous data? What are typical
and maximum sizes for those?
* Would you expect the kernel to filter for specific data on the
receiver side?
* Would a user space receiver want to always see all data from one
sender, or only the latest word?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 20:29 Adding support for ARINC429 into the Linux kernel Guenter Roeck
2013-06-19 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-06-20 4:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-06-20 8:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-28 21:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-01 10:06 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201306192345.31106.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox