From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
David Cohen <david.a.cohen@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio-langwell: remove Withney point support
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:02:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130620080212.GO11878@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VdqOTUtp=LEN8hbxJq1E2-BxhxVW0BtHUYhW=-4soYqsQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:09:37AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Linus Walleij
> >> <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please give some context though, Wikipedia says:
> >>>
> >>> Whitney Point is the codename of a PCH in the Oak Trail platform
> >>> chipset for Atom Lincroft microprocessors.
> >>> This has the following variations:
> >>> 82SM35 (PCH SM35)
> >>
> >>> Does this mean that platform is not coming back to support Linux
> >>> ever again
> >>
> >> I think it's very unluckily.
> >> May be David could shed a light...
> >
> > Is that some kind of NACK?
>
> No, the opposite.
> I meant it's very unluckily that we will have any Oak Trail user in future.
You mean *unlikely*, right?
AFAICT there are no real Oak Trail products outside Intel. It was
superseded by Medfield.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 6:43 [PATCH] gpio-langwell: remove Withney point support Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-19 19:23 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-19 21:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-20 6:46 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-20 7:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-20 8:02 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-06-20 8:40 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-21 0:48 ` David Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130620080212.GO11878@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=david.a.cohen@intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox