From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757385Ab3FTJHt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:07:49 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:13110 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754182Ab3FTJHp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:07:45 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,903,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="356621418" Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:07:37 +0200 From: Samuel Ortiz To: "J, KEERTHY" Cc: "broonie@kernel.org" , "ldewangan@nvidia.com" , "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" , "swarren@nvidia.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "gg@slimlogic.co.uk" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature Message-ID: <20130620090737.GF15667@zurbaran> References: <1371621470-22279-1-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> <1371621470-22279-3-git-send-email-j-keerthy@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:34:42AM +0000, J, KEERTHY wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: J, KEERTHY > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:28 AM > > To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: broonie@kernel.org; J, KEERTHY; ldewangan@nvidia.com; > > sameo@linux.intel.com; grant.likely@secretlab.ca; swarren@nvidia.com; > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; devicetree- > > discuss@lists.ozlabs.org; gg@slimlogic.co.uk > > Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature > > > > From: J Keerthy > > > > The SMPS10 regulator is not presesnt in all the variants of the PALMAS > > PMIC family. Hence adding a feature to distingush between them. > > > > Could you please pull this patch? I'm reverting this one for now as of_match_device is not define for !CONFIG_OF. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/