From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6.
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:04:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130623160452.GA11740@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130623150603.GA32313@redhat.com>
On 06/23, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:36:34PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > > > Dave, I am sorry but all I can do is to ask you to do more testing.
> > > > Could you please reproduce the lockup again on the clean Linus's
> > > > current ? (and _without_ reverting 8aac6270, of course).
> > >
> > > I'll give it a shot. Just rebuilt clean tree, and restarted the tests.
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
>
> ok, hit it on rc7 without the revert
Great, thanks.
> [11018.927809] [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
> [11054.897670] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 22s! [trinity-child2:14482]
> [11054.898503] Modules linked in: bridge stp snd_seq_dummy tun fuse hidp bnep rfcomm can_raw ipt_ULOG can_bcm nfnetlink af_rxrpc llc2 rose caif_socket caif can netrom appletalk af_802154 scsi_transport_iscsi nfc pppoe pppox ppp_generic slhc ipx p8023 psnap p8022 llc ax25 irda crc_ccitt af_key bluetooth rfkill x25 rds atm phonet coretemp hwmon kvm_intel kvm snd_hda_codec_realtek crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel snd_hda_codec_hdmi microcode snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec pcspkr snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm e1000e snd_page_alloc ptp snd_timer pps_core snd soundcore xfs libcrc32c
> [11054.905490] irq event stamp: 3857095
> [11054.905926] hardirqs last enabled at (3857094): [<ffffffff816ed9a0>] restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [11054.906945] hardirqs last disabled at (3857095): [<ffffffff816f64aa>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x6a/0x80
> [11054.908054] softirqs last enabled at (3856322): [<ffffffff810542e4>] __do_softirq+0x194/0x440
> [11054.909102] softirqs last disabled at (3856325): [<ffffffff8105474d>] irq_exit+0xcd/0xe0
> [11054.910088] CPU: 2 PID: 14482 Comm: trinity-child2 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc7+ #31
> [11054.912900] task: ffff8801ae44ca40 ti: ffff88021fe60000 task.ti: ffff88021fe60000
> [11054.913800] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81054201>] [<ffffffff81054201>] __do_softirq+0xb1/0x440
OK, __do_softirq() again. But this doesn't necessarily mean it
is the offender.
Just in case, did you change /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh ?
This times the numbers look different.
Could you please do the following:
1. # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
# echo 0 >> options/function-trace
# echo preemptirqsoff >> current_tracer
2. reproduce the lockup again
3. show the result of
# cat trace
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-23 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 16:45 frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6 Dave Jones
2013-06-19 17:53 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-19 18:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-19 18:42 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-20 0:12 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-20 16:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-06-20 16:27 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-21 15:11 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-21 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-22 1:37 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-22 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-22 21:59 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-23 5:00 ` Andrew Vagin
2013-06-23 14:36 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-23 15:06 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-23 16:04 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-06-24 0:21 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 2:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 14:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-24 14:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-24 16:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 16:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-24 16:51 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 17:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 16:55 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-25 17:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 17:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 17:26 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-25 17:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 17:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 17:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-25 17:34 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 16:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-24 16:49 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 15:57 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-24 17:44 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-24 17:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-24 18:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-25 15:35 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-25 16:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 5:23 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-26 19:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 20:00 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-27 3:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-26 5:48 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-26 19:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-26 19:40 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-27 0:22 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-27 1:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-06-27 2:32 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-27 7:55 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-27 10:06 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-27 12:52 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-27 15:21 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-28 1:13 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-28 3:58 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-28 10:28 ` Jan Kara
2013-06-29 3:39 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-01 12:00 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-02 6:29 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02 8:19 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-02 12:38 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02 14:05 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-02 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-02 16:57 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-02 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-03 3:07 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-03 3:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-07-03 4:49 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-04 7:19 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-29 20:13 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-29 22:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-29 23:44 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-30 0:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-01 12:49 ` Pavel Machek
2013-06-30 0:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-06-30 2:05 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-30 2:34 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-27 14:30 ` Dave Jones
2013-06-28 1:18 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-28 2:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-28 3:54 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-28 5:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-28 7:21 ` Dave Chinner
2013-06-28 8:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-28 8:32 ` Al Viro
2013-06-28 8:22 ` Al Viro
2013-06-28 9:49 ` Jan Kara
2013-07-01 17:57 ` block layer softlockup Dave Jones
2013-07-02 2:07 ` Dave Chinner
2013-07-02 6:01 ` Dave Jones
2013-07-02 7:30 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130623160452.GA11740@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=avagin@openvz.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).