From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Expose /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children unconditionally
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:52:47 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130625215247.GC1726@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVxm2wHvLgexG6fZO+h1rNHC_qDCv6B+4XuANHgSQU4iw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 02:36:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 06/26, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:51:45PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > This is currently only available if CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, which
> >> > is hidden under CONFIG_EXPERT. It's generally useful functionality,
> >> > though, so expose it unconditionally.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> >> Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> >
> > I didn't see the patch but I guess it is trivial and I agree with intent ;)
>
> The patch works, but "children" is only listed under task/<tid>, not
> under /proc/<pid>. Is that intentional? Fixing it would be a
> one-liner.
Yeah, it's intentional. Here some explanations from Oleg (check out
the whole thread, it's not that big https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/9/220)
in short this might require some more code, but i'll re-check tomorrow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 19:51 [PATCH] proc: Expose /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children unconditionally Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-25 20:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-06-25 20:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-25 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-25 21:52 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2013-06-25 22:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-26 7:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-06-26 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-26 16:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-26 21:05 ` [PATCH] proc: Document that /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children really is per-thread Andy Lutomirski
2013-06-27 6:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-07-01 16:49 ` Rob Landley
2013-07-01 17:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130625215247.GC1726@moon \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).