From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751803Ab3FZDVM (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:21:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34691 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751380Ab3FZDVL (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:21:11 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:20:27 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino To: Hyunhee Kim Cc: Kyungmin Park , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz, minchan@kernel.org, anton@enomsg.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmpressure: implement strict mode Message-ID: <20130625232027.7c3ed3de@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20130625175129.7c0d79e1@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:12:15 +0900 Hyunhee Kim wrote: > Please see "[PATCH v3] memcg: event control at vmpressure". mail > thread. (and also the thread I sent last Saturday.) > There was discussion on this mode not sending lower events when "level > != ev->level". The new argument this patch adds should be orthogonal to what has been discussed and suggested in that thread. The patches conflict though, but it's just a matter of rebasing if both are ACKed.