From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
Cc: <balbi@ti.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci-plat: Enable XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS quirk for xhci-plat
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:25:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130626122555.GE12640@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CADB9D.3070206@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1937 bytes --]
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:46:29PM +0530, George Cherian wrote:
> >>@@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ static void xhci_plat_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> >> * dev struct in order to setup MSI
> >> */
> >> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_MSI;
> >>+
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * In some xhci controllers which follows xhci 1.0 spec gives a spurious
> >>+ * success event after a short transfer. This quirk will ignore such
> >>+ * spurious event. Hit this issue in synopsis xhci controllers with
> >>+ * hci_version > 0.96
> >>+ */
> >>+
> >>+ if (xhci->hci_version > 0x96)
> >>+ xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS;
> >> }
> >doesn't look like the correct way to do this. What if enabling that
> >quirk on hosts which don't have the quirk cause problems ?
> For a controller which does not have this issue will never get a
> spurious success for short packet ( and that too for only ISOCH).
>
> per this commit ad808333d Intel xhci: Ignore spurious successful event.
>
> This spurious successful event behavior isn't technically disallowed by
> the xHCI specification, so make the xHCI driver just ignore the spurious
> completion event.
still we don't want to enable quirks for devices which aren't quirky :-)
Now how Sarah correctly enables the quirk flag only for the known "bad"
Panther Point device.
> >I would suggest adding a platform_data which (in our case) dwc3 will
> >pass to xhci-plat. Then you can do proper revision detection of the
> >synopsys controller and set the quirk only on the failing hosts.
> >
> >BTW, do you have the STARS number for this errata ?
> No STARS number yet.
once we have it, let's make sure to follow what we do on the dwc3 and
list it in a comment. You already that you found the bug with a Synopsys
controller anyway, might as well point to the fact that there is a
ticket with synopsys to track this issue.
cheers
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-26 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-26 8:58 [PATCH] usb: host: xhci-plat: Enable XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS quirk for xhci-plat George Cherian
2013-06-26 9:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-26 12:16 ` George Cherian
2013-06-26 12:25 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-06-26 16:53 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-06-30 21:00 ` Sarah Sharp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130626122555.GE12640@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=george.cherian@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox