public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option
@ 2013-06-26 14:58 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  2013-06-27  5:29 ` Namhyung Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2013-06-26 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jiri Olsa; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

Hi Jiri,

	About the patch below, can't this be solved by using a regex
instead of a simple substring search instead of adding a new command
line option?

- Arnaldo

commit 5b42ff035ec784c5c42c4a6bb9e7fada882f097e
Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 18 18:31:50 2013 +0200

    perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option
    
    Introducing new -P/--parent-deep report option. It does the
    same as '-p' but it force the deep search of the callchain
    and looks for the deepest possible match.
    
    The -p option searches for the first match of the parent
    pattern in the callchain.
    
      $ perf report -i perf.data.delete -p perf_session__delete -s parent
    
      +  99.51%  [other]
      +   0.46%  perf_session__delete_dead_threads
      +   0.03%  perf_session__delete
      +   0.00%  perf_session__delete_threads
    
    so we got multiple 'different' matches instancies, while
    they all belong under perf_session__delete function:
    
      $ perf report -i perf.data.delete -P perf_session__delete -s parent
    
      +  99.51%  [other]
      +   0.49%  perf_session__delete
    
    NOTE the 'p' vs 'P' difference in above commands above.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option
  2013-06-26 14:58 perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2013-06-27  5:29 ` Namhyung Kim
  2013-06-27  9:21   ` Jiri Olsa
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Namhyung Kim @ 2013-06-27  5:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; +Cc: Jiri Olsa, Linux Kernel Mailing List

Hi Arnaldo,

On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:58:53 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> 	About the patch below, can't this be solved by using a regex
> instead of a simple substring search instead of adding a new command
> line option?

???

IIUC he reused parent_regex for this.

And I think we can have the same effect by using -G and -p option
together without this new option.

Thanks,
Namhyung

>
> - Arnaldo
>
> commit 5b42ff035ec784c5c42c4a6bb9e7fada882f097e
> Author: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Date:   Tue Jun 18 18:31:50 2013 +0200
>
>     perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option
>     
>     Introducing new -P/--parent-deep report option. It does the
>     same as '-p' but it force the deep search of the callchain
>     and looks for the deepest possible match.
>     
>     The -p option searches for the first match of the parent
>     pattern in the callchain.
>     
>       $ perf report -i perf.data.delete -p perf_session__delete -s parent
>     
>       +  99.51%  [other]
>       +   0.46%  perf_session__delete_dead_threads
>       +   0.03%  perf_session__delete
>       +   0.00%  perf_session__delete_threads
>     
>     so we got multiple 'different' matches instancies, while
>     they all belong under perf_session__delete function:
>     
>       $ perf report -i perf.data.delete -P perf_session__delete -s parent
>     
>       +  99.51%  [other]
>       +   0.49%  perf_session__delete
>     
>     NOTE the 'p' vs 'P' difference in above commands above.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option
  2013-06-27  5:29 ` Namhyung Kim
@ 2013-06-27  9:21   ` Jiri Olsa
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Olsa @ 2013-06-27  9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Namhyung Kim; +Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:29:21PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:58:53 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > 	About the patch below, can't this be solved by using a regex
> > instead of a simple substring search instead of adding a new command
> > line option?
> 
> ???
> 
> IIUC he reused parent_regex for this.
> 
> And I think we can have the same effect by using -G and -p option
> together without this new option.

I think you're right.. I haven't realized I could reverse
the backtrace and search the same way via -p

thanks,
jirka

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-27  9:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-26 14:58 perf tools: Introduce new -P/--parent-deep report option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-06-27  5:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-06-27  9:21   ` Jiri Olsa

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox