From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale-asia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
holt@sgi.com, rob@landley.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
yinghai@kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Transparent on-demand memory setup initialization embedded in the (GFP) buddy allocator
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:24:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130629072441.GA15394@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51CDF417.3050406@sgi.com>
* Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 10:35 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 9:30:02 PM UTC+8, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:22:48 +0200 Ingo Molnar
> ><mi...@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > except that on 32 TB
> >> > systems we don't spend ~2 hours initializing 8,589,934,592
> >page heads.
> >>
> >> That's about a million a second which is crazy slow - even my
> >prehistoric desktop
> >> is 100x faster than that.
> >>
> >> Where's all this time actually being spent?
> >
> > The complexity of a directory-lookup architecture to make the
> > (intrinsically unscalable) cache-coherency protocol scalable gives you
> > a ~1us roundtrip to remote NUMA nodes.
> >
> > Probably a lot of time is spent in some memsets, and RMW cycles which
> > are setting page bits, which are intrinsically synchronous, so the
> > initialising core can't get to 12 or so outstanding memory
> > transactions.
> >
> > Since EFI memory ranges have a flag to state if they are zerod (which
> > may be a fair assumption for memory on non-bootstrap processor NUMA
> > nodes), we can probably collapse the RMWs to just writes.
> >
> > A normal write will require a coherency cycle, then a fetch and a
> > writeback when it's evicted from the cache. For this purpose,
> > non-temporal writes would eliminate the cache line fetch and give a
> > massive increase in bandwidth. We wouldn't even need a store-fence as
> > the initialising core is the only one online.
>
> Could you elaborate a bit more? or suggest a specific area to look at?
>
> After some experiments with trying to just set some fields in the struct
> page directly I haven't been able to produce any improvements. Of
> course there is lots about the area which I don't have much experience
> with.
Any such improvement will at most be in the 10-20% range.
I'd suggest first concentrating on the 1000-fold boot time initialization
speedup that the buddy allocator delayed initialization can offer, and
speeding up whatever remains after that stage - in a much more
development-friendly environment. (You'll be able to run 'perf record
./calloc-1TB' after bootup and get meaningful results, etc.)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-29 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 3:35 [RFC] Transparent on-demand memory setup initialization embedded in the (GFP) buddy allocator Daniel J Blueman
2013-06-28 20:37 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-29 7:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-06-29 18:03 ` Nathan Zimmer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-06-21 16:25 [RFC 0/2] Delay initializing of large sections of memory Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-21 16:25 ` [RFC 2/2] x86_64, mm: Reinsert the absent memory Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-23 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-24 20:36 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-25 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-25 17:22 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-25 18:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-25 18:51 ` Mike Travis
2013-06-26 9:22 ` [RFC] Transparent on-demand memory setup initialization embedded in the (GFP) buddy allocator Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 13:28 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-26 13:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 15:02 ` Nathan Zimmer
2013-06-26 16:15 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130629072441.GA15394@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel@numascale-asia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nzimmer@sgi.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=sp@numascale.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).