From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756536Ab3GDLHw (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 4 Jul 2013 07:07:52 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1795 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756152Ab3GDLHu (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 4 Jul 2013 07:07:50 -0400
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:07:47 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kvm/emulate.c: simplify NOP (opcode 0x90) check
Message-ID: <20130704110747.GH5113@redhat.com>
References: <1372928309-16488-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>
 <20130704091345.GB5113@redhat.com>
 <51D55728.4060909@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51D55728.4060909@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 01:06:16PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 11:13 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:58:29AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >> The check sits in switch() statement which itself can check
> >> for opcode 0x90 far more efficiently.
> >>
> >> On assembler level, this change simply eliminates the following
> >> bit of code:
> >>
> >> 4c 8b a3 d8 00 00 00    mov    0xd8(%rbx),%r12
> >> 31 f6                   xor    %esi,%esi
> >> 48 89 df                mov    %rbx,%rdi
> >> e8 32 8c ff ff          callq  490 <reg_read>
> >> 48 8d 83 78 01 00 00    lea    0x178(%rbx),%rax
> >> 83 8b 70 01 00 00 01    orl    $0x1,0x170(%rbx)
> >> 83 8b 74 01 00 00 01    orl    $0x1,0x174(%rbx)
> >> 49 39 c4                cmp    %rax,%r12
> >> 0f 84 88 fa ff ff       je     7304 <x86_emulate_insn+0x204>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> >> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> >> CC: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 +++---
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> >> index 2bc1e81..7e6e74a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> >> @@ -4544,9 +4544,9 @@ special_insn:
> >>  	case 0x8d: /* lea r16/r32, m */
> >>  		ctxt->dst.val = ctxt->src.addr.mem.ea;
> >>  		break;
> >> -	case 0x90 ... 0x97: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */
> >> -		if (ctxt->dst.addr.reg == reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX))
> >> -			break;
> >> +	case 0x90: /* nop */
> >> +		break;
> > This does not work on 64bit and REX prefix.
> 
> Can you elaborate?
> 
> 0x90 is special-cased in CPU to be a NOP regardless of bit width.
> IOW, xchg %eax,%eax ordinarily would clear upper 32 bits of %rax,
> but 0x90 doesn't do that.
> 
> Do you mean that with REX.R==1, 0x90 will refer to R8?
Yes.

--
			Gleb.