From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933160Ab3GLMO1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:14:27 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]:44175 "EHLO mail-ee0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932193Ab3GLMOY (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:14:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:14:20 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Valdis Kletnieks , "Li, Zhen-Hua" , Joerg Roedel Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: next-20130709 DMAR issues Message-ID: <20130712121419.GA22945@gmail.com> References: <29624.1373475702@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29624.1373475702@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Cc:-ed a few DMAR people.) * Valdis Kletnieks wrote: > Dell Latitude E6530. > > Seeing a new error message crop up in next-0709 that wasn't there with 0703. > Particularly odd, last person to touch dmar.c was on 05/20/2013, so no smoking > guns there... > > egrep -i 'dmar|linux ver' /var/log/messages gives me: > > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.10.0-next-20130703 (valdis@turing-police.cc.vt.edu) (gcc version 4.8.1 20130612 (Red Hat 4.8.1-2) (GCC) ) #99 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 3 17:40:09 EDT 2013 > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] ACPI: DMAR 00000000cb7fd298 00080 (v01 INTEL SNB 00000001 INTL 00000001) > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021530] dmar: Host address width 36 > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021536] dmar: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x1 > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021569] dmar: IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap c9008020660262 ecap f0105a > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021576] dmar: RMRR base: 0x000000ce761000 end: 0x000000ce780fff > Jul 9 21:47:15 turing-police kernel: [ 1.023235] DMAR: No ATSR found > > That's what it usually says. But now I have: > > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] Linux version 3.10.0-next-20130709 (valdis@turing-police.cc.vt.edu) (gcc version 4.8.1 20130612 (Red Hat 4.8.1-2) (GCC) ) #100 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jul 9 16:01:59 EDT 2013 > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.000000] ACPI: DMAR 00000000cb7fd298 00080 (v01 INTEL SNB 00000001 INTL 00000001) > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021453] dmar: Host address width 36 > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021456] dmar: DRHD base: 0x000000fed90000 flags: 0x1 > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021485] dmar: IOMMU 0: reg_base_addr fed90000 ver 1:0 cap c9008020660262 ecap f0105a > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021487] dmar: RMRR base: 0x000000ce761000 end: 0x000000ce780fff > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021575] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2 > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021583] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [00:1f.2] fault addr ce71d000 > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 0.021583] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set > Jul 10 12:20:19 turing-police kernel: [ 1.034643] DMAR: No ATSR found > > Now I have 3 extra messages talking about handling a fault status. lspci says 00:1f.2 is: > > 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 7 Series Chipset Family 6-port SATA Controller [AHCI mode] (rev 04) > > I found similar in a thread here: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1212.1/02319.html > which ended with Don Dutile saying: > > "DMAR table does not have an entry for this device to this region. > Once the driver reconfigs/resets the device to stop polling bios-boot > cmd rings and use (new) OS (dma-mapped) rings, there's a period of time > during this transition that the hw is babbling away to an area that is no > longer mapped." > > But I'm not convinced this is the same issue - why did it change between 0703 and 0709, > when I haven't updated the firmware. No relevant .config changes between the two, either. > > If this doesn't ring any bells, I'l go do the bisect thing...