Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

[Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>]

[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:
> >
> > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next
> > where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content
> > on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content shouldn't appear in
> > the linux-next content during the merge window.  There is no question
> > that the linux-next process is integral to the main flow of patches to
> > mainline, so I think Documentation/development-process/2.Process (the
> > same file) should also capture those points in the linux-next section.
> > Do you have some pre-canned text we can insert there, or should I draft
> > something up for you to review?
> 
> The latter would be certainly easier for me :-)  If that is not easy, let
> me know and I will write something (even without swearing ;-)).

I'll do something for the latter, but I can't promise to refrain from
swearing...  ;-)

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au