From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Oliver Schinagl <oliver+list@schinagl.nl>
Cc: linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for Allwinner's Security ID fuses
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:41:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130716064107.GA10868@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E466A3.4010503@schinagl.nl>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:16:19PM +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
>
> With your latest patches for binary attributes and your blog post, I
> thought that you want to create your binary attributes before the probe
> function, to avoid the userspace race. To do that, we have two options,
> create them in init (ugly?) or fill the .group member if available so it
> gets automatically created from the register function.
Yes, the .group thing should be what is needed here.
> Well in my case, I'm using the module_platform_driver() macro which
> expects the struct platform_driver. Platform_driver has a device_driver
> member .driver where the .groups is located. Great, using that works and
> we should have the sysfs entry race-free. However I don't know hot to
> exchange data between that and the rest of my driver.
>
> Before I used to_platform_device(kobj_to_dev(kobj)) as passed via the
> .read function to obtain a platform_device where i could use
> platform_get_drvdata on. All was good, but that doesn't fly now and my
> knowledge is a bit short as to why.
I don't understand, why not use the platform device that was passed to
the binary attribute write function?
> The second method is finding some other shared structure given that we
> get a platform_device in the probe function, yet I couldn't find
> anything and this platform_device isn't the same as the one from the .read.
It should be, why isn't it?
> Of course using a global var bypasses this issue, but I'm sure it won't
> pass review ;)
The platform device structure should have what you need, right?
> So using these new patches for binary attributes, how can I pass data
> between my driver and the sysfs files using a platform_driver? Or are
> other 'hacks' needed and using the .groups attribute from
> platform_driver->device_driver->groups is really the wrong approach.
>
> I did ask around and still haven't figured it out so far, so I do
> apologize if you feel I'm wasting your precious time.
How is the platform device not the same thing that was passed to your
probe function?
>
> Oliver
> /*
> * Copyright (c) 2013 Oliver Schinagl
> * http://www.linux-sunxi.org
> *
> * Oliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>
> *
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> * (at your option) any later version.
> *
> * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> * GNU General Public License for more details.
> *
> * This driver exposes the Allwinner security ID, a 128 bit eeprom, in byte
> * sized chunks.
> */
>
> #include <linux/compiler.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/kobject.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/random.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> #define DRV_NAME "sunxi-sid"
>
> /* There are 4 32-bit keys */
> #define SID_KEYS 4
> /* Each key is 4 bytes long */
> #define SID_SIZE (SID_KEYS * 4)
>
> /* We read the entire key, due to a 32 bit read alignment requirement. Since we
> * want to return the requested byte, this resuls in somewhat slower code and
> * uses 4 times more reads as needed but keeps code simpler. Since the SID is
> * only very rarly probed, this is not really an issue.
> */
> static u8 sunxi_sid_read_byte(const void __iomem *sid_reg_base,
> const unsigned int offset)
> {
> u32 sid_key;
>
> if (offset >= SID_SIZE)
> return 0;
>
> sid_key = ioread32be(sid_reg_base + round_down(offset, 4));
> sid_key >>= (offset % 4) * 8;
>
> return sid_key; /* Only return the last byte */
> }
>
> static ssize_t eeprom_read(struct file *fd, struct kobject *kobj,
> struct bin_attribute *attr, char *buf,
> loff_t pos, size_t size)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> void __iomem *sid_reg_base;
> int i;
>
> pdev = to_platform_device(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
> sid_reg_base = (void __iomem *)platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
Great, isn't that what you need?
> printk("0x%x, 0x%x 0x%x 0x%x\n", kobj, kobj_to_dev(kobj), pdev, sid_reg_base);
>
> if (pos < 0 || pos >= SID_SIZE)
> return 0;
> if (size > SID_SIZE - pos)
> size = SID_SIZE - pos;
>
> for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
> buf[i] = sunxi_sid_read_byte(sid_reg_base, pos + i);
>
> return i;
> }
What are you missing in this function that you have in your probe
function?
This driver looks fine, what is not working properly?
totally confused,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-17 20:59 [PATCH 0/2] v4 Driver for Allwinner sunxi Security ID Oliver Schinagl
2013-06-17 20:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] Initial support for Allwinner's Security ID fuses Oliver Schinagl
2013-06-17 21:06 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-17 22:58 ` Greg KH
2013-06-17 23:23 ` [linux-sunxi] " Henrik Nordström
2013-06-24 9:29 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-24 16:04 ` Greg KH
2013-06-24 17:11 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-06-24 18:15 ` Greg KH
2013-06-24 21:21 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-06-24 21:46 ` Greg KH
2013-06-26 8:32 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-06-26 17:51 ` Greg KH
2013-07-05 7:24 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-07-06 19:36 ` Greg KH
2013-07-07 0:17 ` Greg KH
2013-07-15 21:16 ` [linux-sunxi] " Oliver Schinagl
2013-07-16 6:41 ` Greg KH [this message]
2013-07-16 21:02 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-07-17 4:20 ` Greg KH
2013-07-17 11:46 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-17 16:17 ` Greg KH
2013-07-19 9:42 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-19 23:49 ` Greg KH
2013-07-30 13:22 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-07-30 14:20 ` Greg KH
2013-07-30 17:39 ` Oliver Schinagl
2013-06-26 9:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-26 17:51 ` Greg KH
2013-06-24 21:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-26 9:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-06-26 17:49 ` Greg KH
2013-06-18 5:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130716064107.GA10868@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=oliver+list@schinagl.nl \
--cc=oliver@schinagl.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox