From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757731Ab3GRJEQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 18 Jul 2013 05:04:16 -0400
Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:65484 "EHLO
	mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757022Ab3GRJEN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 18 Jul 2013 05:04:13 -0400
X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn
X-Originating-IP: 50.131.214.131
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+OqK2G2BYG8Bs5c7ce8p5T
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:04:08 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Benoit Cousson <benoit.cousson@linaro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: omap4-sdp: add dynamic pin states for
 uart3/4
Message-ID: <20130718090408.GU7656@atomide.com>
References: <1374061312-25469-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
 <1374061312-25469-4-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
 <20130717153248.GI7656@atomide.com>
 <51E6C939.40208@ti.com>
 <20130718080953.GR7656@atomide.com>
 <51E7AD38.6010108@ti.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <51E7AD38.6010108@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [130718 02:01]:
> On 07/18/2013 11:09 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
> Don't think it's debug code - IO chain need to be rearmed after each
> PRCM IO IRQ - otherwise IO wakeup events may be lost (at least on
> OMAP4, OMAP5 requires more complex handling(( ).

Nope, only after the mux register changes. I've verified it on
am3730 with off-idle for both serial and wl12xx.
 
> I didn't pick up your padconf patches yet -seems i need to be in sync :)

Well you need those for proper wake-up event support..

> Below the diff I used to verify IO wake up (It follows old IO daisy
> chain hanlding models in hwmod before DT):

..then these changes not needed with the pinctrl-single changes.

Regards,

Tony