public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
       [not found] ` <20130717091028.GA31187@localhost>
@ 2013-07-17  9:29   ` Daniel Vetter
  2013-07-17 10:01     ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-07-17  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fengguang Wu
  Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov, kbuild-all, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Joe Perches, intel-gfx

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> FYI, there are new warnings show up in
>
> tree:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes
> head:   71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5
> commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2
>
> scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch
>
> ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
> #41:
> cc: stable.]

Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash
maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc:
stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for
such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch
maintainer.
-Daniel


> ---
> 0-DAY kernel build testing backend              Open Source Technology Center
> http://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/kbuild                 Intel Corporation



--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
  2013-07-17  9:29   ` [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]' Daniel Vetter
@ 2013-07-17 10:01     ` Joe Perches
  2013-07-17 11:24       ` Daniel Vetter
  2013-07-18 14:58       ` Fengguang Wu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-07-17 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter
  Cc: Fengguang Wu, Konstantin Khlebnikov, kbuild-all,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, intel-gfx

On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:29 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > FYI, there are new warnings show up in
> > tree:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes
> > head:   71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5
> > commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2
> >
> > scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch
> >
> > ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
> > #41:
> > cc: stable.]
> 
> Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash
> maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc:
> stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for
> such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch
> maintainer.
> -Daniel

(It would have been nice to get the content that failes
 instead of having to pull the tree)

Don't wrap text to start a line with cc:

    Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
    [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard
    layout for the commit citation. Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a
    cc: stable.]
    Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (Note: tiny conflict due to the addition of

You could have added something like:

    [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard
             layout for the commit citation.
             Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a cc: stable.]



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
  2013-07-17 10:01     ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-07-17 11:24       ` Daniel Vetter
  2013-07-18 14:58       ` Fengguang Wu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-07-17 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Fengguang Wu, Konstantin Khlebnikov, kbuild-all,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, intel-gfx

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:01:38AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:29 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > FYI, there are new warnings show up in
> > > tree:   git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes
> > > head:   71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5
> > > commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2
> > >
> > > scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch
> > >
> > > ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
> > > #41:
> > > cc: stable.]
> > 
> > Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash
> > maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc:
> > stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for
> > such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch
> > maintainer.
> > -Daniel
> 
> (It would have been nice to get the content that failes
>  instead of having to pull the tree)

Oops, sorry.

> Don't wrap text to start a line with cc:
> 
>     Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>     Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
>     [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard
>     layout for the commit citation. Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a
>     cc: stable.]
>     Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (Note: tiny conflict due to the addition of
> 
> You could have added something like:
> 
>     [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard
>              layout for the commit citation.
>              Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a cc: stable.]

Ok, I'll try to rewrap if the cc: hits the first row next time around -
just didn't occur to me that checkpatch would notice and I tend to not
re-run checkpatch before pushing when editing a patch a bit.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]'
  2013-07-17 10:01     ` Joe Perches
  2013-07-17 11:24       ` Daniel Vetter
@ 2013-07-18 14:58       ` Fengguang Wu
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fengguang Wu @ 2013-07-18 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches
  Cc: Daniel Vetter, Konstantin Khlebnikov, kbuild-all,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, intel-gfx

Joe,

> (It would have been nice to get the content that failes
>  instead of having to pull the tree)

Good suggestion! I'll attach the git-format-patch result in the
checkpatch.pl reports in future.

Thanks,
Fengguang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-07-18 14:58 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <51e63ed0.zKgIdwWoDkYbRWqH%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
     [not found] ` <20130717091028.GA31187@localhost>
2013-07-17  9:29   ` [drm-intel:drm-intel-fixes 52/52] ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]' Daniel Vetter
2013-07-17 10:01     ` Joe Perches
2013-07-17 11:24       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-07-18 14:58       ` Fengguang Wu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox