public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RTC: Add an alarm disable quirk
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:13:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130719151321.GD19581@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130719142628.GC19581@pd.tnic>

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:26:28PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:53:49AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > I assumed it was some sort of BIOS issue where any modification of the
> > > RTC_AIE bit caused the alarm irq line to be left high(or something
> > > like that) that triggered the immediate power-on on shutdown. But I've
> > > not been able to dig down on this.
> > 
> > Ha, this actually fits like an ass on a bucket (don't ask - German
> > proverb :-)).
> > 
> > If what you're saying is actually the case, then this explains why not
> > writing to 0xb doesn't cause the alarm irq to fire.
> > 
> > Btw, in the trace above we do the disabling twice. Once from
> > rtc_timer_remove() and then again from rtc_timer_do_work().
> > 
> > So, if we disable it once and we touch RTC_AIE again causing the second
> > time to rearm the alarm irq, this would explain the issue. Which reminds
> > me:
> > 
> > Maybe we should read out the alarm interrupt first and disable it only
> > if it is enabled - that would save us the modification of RTC_AIE. Cool,
> > I'll try that tomorrow.
> 
> Well, the below seems to do the trick. But since I don't trust the BIOS
> in any way, I'll run it a couple more days here. Btw, I think we should
> commit this regardless, as it saves us unneeded writes:

Nope, this doesn't help - box just rebooted. :(

So I'm back to the DMI quirk patch...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-19 15:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18 15:44 [PATCH] RTC: Add an alarm disable quirk Borislav Petkov
2013-07-18 16:35 ` John Stultz
2013-07-18 22:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-19 14:26     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-19 15:13       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-07-19 21:34         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-20 17:00           ` [PATCH -v2] " Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 21:00             ` John Stultz
2013-07-22 21:19               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 22:03                 ` John Stultz
2013-07-22 20:59         ` [PATCH] " John Stultz
2013-07-22 21:12           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 21:15             ` John Stultz
2013-07-22 21:27               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-22 22:17                 ` John Stultz
2013-07-23  5:03                   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130719151321.GD19581@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rabin.vincent@stericsson.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox