From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756354Ab3GVGJr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 02:09:47 -0400 Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:38875 "EHLO e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756332Ab3GVGJo (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 02:09:44 -0400 From: Raghavendra K T To: , , , , , , Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, , Raghavendra K T , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:47:04 +0530 Message-Id: <20130722061704.24737.74372.sendpatchset@codeblue> In-Reply-To: <20130722061631.24737.75508.sendpatchset@codeblue> References: <20130722061631.24737.75508.sendpatchset@codeblue> Subject: [PATCH RFC V11 2/18] x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 13072206-1396-0000-0000-0000034B820C Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks From: Raghavendra K T The code size expands somewhat, and its better to just call a function rather than inline it. Thanks Jeremy for original version of ARCH_NOINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK config patch, which is simplified. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index b32ebf9..112e712 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -632,6 +632,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks" depends on PARAVIRT && SMP + select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK ---help--- Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly